• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Accounting for Overheads

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Accounting for Overheads

  • This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 9, 2016 at 9:16 am #314238
    afsheen18
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    Q) A cost centre has an OAR of $4.25 per machine hour, based on a budgeted activity level of 12,400 machine hours.

    In the period covered by the budget, actual machine hours worked were 2% more than the budgeted hours and the actual O/H expenditure incurred in the cost centre was $56,389.

    What was the total over or under absorption of O/H in the cost centre for the period?

    A. $1,054 over absorbed
    B. $2,635 under absorbed
    C. $3,689 over absorbed
    D. $3,689 under absorbed

    I know that we need to subtract absorbed O/H by the actual expenditure ($56,389) but I’m a little confused on how to get the absorbed O/H. A formula I learned in my class for absorbed O/H was Overhead Absorption Rate (OAR) x actual activity, but how do I get the actual activity? Do I just multiply 12,400 by 0.02?

    Your answer would help me loads!

    May 9, 2016 at 9:16 am #314239
    afsheen18
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    The question is from Kaplan btw

    May 9, 2016 at 12:29 pm #314263
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54831
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The actual hours are 2% more than the budget hours and are therefore 12,400 + (2% x 12,400) = 12,648 hours.

    Therefore the total overheads absorbed will be 12,648 x $4.25 = $53,754.

    Therefore there is an under absorption of 56,389 – 53,754 = $2,635

    May 11, 2016 at 8:42 am #314555
    afsheen18
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    Oh god! I did the same thing but I messed up the multiplication. I wrote down 12,648 as 12,846. I feel so silly…

    But thank you!

    May 11, 2016 at 11:01 am #314571
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54831
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 17 – The nature of communication – Questions
  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 14 – How people learn – Questions
  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in