• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Accounting for Overheads

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Accounting for Overheads

  • This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 9, 2016 at 9:16 am #314238
    afsheen18
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    Q) A cost centre has an OAR of $4.25 per machine hour, based on a budgeted activity level of 12,400 machine hours.

    In the period covered by the budget, actual machine hours worked were 2% more than the budgeted hours and the actual O/H expenditure incurred in the cost centre was $56,389.

    What was the total over or under absorption of O/H in the cost centre for the period?

    A. $1,054 over absorbed
    B. $2,635 under absorbed
    C. $3,689 over absorbed
    D. $3,689 under absorbed

    I know that we need to subtract absorbed O/H by the actual expenditure ($56,389) but I’m a little confused on how to get the absorbed O/H. A formula I learned in my class for absorbed O/H was Overhead Absorption Rate (OAR) x actual activity, but how do I get the actual activity? Do I just multiply 12,400 by 0.02?

    Your answer would help me loads!

    May 9, 2016 at 9:16 am #314239
    afsheen18
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    The question is from Kaplan btw

    May 9, 2016 at 12:29 pm #314263
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54662
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The actual hours are 2% more than the budget hours and are therefore 12,400 + (2% x 12,400) = 12,648 hours.

    Therefore the total overheads absorbed will be 12,648 x $4.25 = $53,754.

    Therefore there is an under absorption of 56,389 – 53,754 = $2,635

    May 11, 2016 at 8:42 am #314555
    afsheen18
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    Oh god! I did the same thing but I messed up the multiplication. I wrote down 12,648 as 12,846. I feel so silly…

    But thank you!

    May 11, 2016 at 11:01 am #314571
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54662
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Nashra30 on CIMA E1 Chapter 3 Test
  • azubair on Financial Performance Measurement – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • j.akshaya on Group SFP – Example (Basic consolidation) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • rishitxx on ACCA BT Chapter 1 – The nature and structure of organisations – Questions
  • singhjyoti on Basic group structures – SPLOCI introduction and example – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in