• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Accounting for Labour

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Accounting for Labour

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by AvatarJohn Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 22, 2017 at 1:14 pm #368871
    Avatarsawyunandar
    Member
    • Topics: 22
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    In this example, I want to know how the cents were calculated>>>80c, 83.3c, 66.7c, 10c, 50c

    For example if an employee would make 100 units in a 40 hour week if they were paid $2 per hour, but
    120 units if they were paid $2.50 per hour, and if production overhead is added to cost at the rate of
    $2 per direct labour hour, costs per unit of output would be as follows.
    (a) Costs per unit of output on the low day-rate scheme would be:
    (40x $4)/100
    = $1.60 per unit
    (b) Costs per unit of output on the high day-rate scheme would be:
    (40 x $4.50)/120
    = $1.50 per unit
    (c) Note that in this example the labour cost per unit is lower in the first scheme (80c) than in the
    second (83.3c), but the unit conversion cost (labour plus production overhead) is higher because
    overhead costs per unit are higher at 80c than with the high day-rate scheme (66.7c).
    (d) In this example, the high day-rate scheme would reward both employer (a lower unit cost by
    10c) and employee (an extra 50c earned per hour).

    January 22, 2017 at 4:13 pm #368890
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54845
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I can’t keep explaining a Study Text published by someone else.
    You should watch our free lectures – they are a complete course for Paper F2 – and then you don’t need a Study Text.
    You should practice questions from a Revision Kit published by one of the ACCA approved publishers – they are exam standard questions.
    Any problems with questions on our website or with questions from the BPP Revision Kit then I will help with pleasure.

    The labour cost for 40 hours in the first scheme is 40 x $20 = $80. This is for 100 units, so it is $0.80 per unit.
    The overheads for 40 hours in the first scheme is 40 x $2 = $80. This is for 100 units so this is $0.80 per unit as well.

    It is exactly the same logic to calculate the figures for the second scheme.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • TEDI on IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment – Initial Recognition – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • ChanNV on Framework – measurement – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • ChanNV on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Konstantinos43 on Financial Performance Measurement – Liquidity Measures – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hirak.5 on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 3 Property Income and Investments – Individuals

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in