• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

ACCA – Past Exam – March 2019

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › ACCA – Past Exam – March 2019

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by Stephen Widberg.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 27, 2020 at 4:12 pm #574821
    Vu
    Member
    • Topics: 46
    • Replies: 87
    • ☆☆

    Dear Sir,

    I would like to ask about the question from ACCA past exam:

    “3 (a) (i) Crypto operates in the power industry, and owns 45% of the voting shares in Kurran. Kurran has four other investors which own the remaining 55% of its voting shares and are all technology companies. The largest of these holdings is 18%. Kurran is a property developer and purchases property for its renovation potential and
    subsequent disposal. Crypto has no expertise in this area and is not involved in the renovation or disposal of the property.
    The board of directors of Kurran makes all of the major decisions but Crypto can nominate up to four of the eight board members. Each of the remaining four board members are nominated by each of the other investors. Any major decisions require all board members to vote and for there to be a clear majority. Thus, Crypto has effectively the power of veto on any major decision. There is no shareholder agreement as to
    how Kurran should be operated or who will make the operating decisions for Kurran. The directors of Crypto believe that Crypto has joint control over Kurran because it is the major shareholder and holds the power of veto over major decisions.
    The directors of Crypto would like advice as to whether or not they should account for Kurran under IFRS® 11 Joint Arrangements.”

    I understand that IFRS 11 defines joint control as “Joint control involves the contractually agreed sharing of control and arrangements subject to joint control are classified as either a joint venture (representing a share of net assets and equity accounted) or a joint operation (representing rights to assets and obligations for liabilities, accounted for accordingly).”

    Referring to the questions, as the control decision is made by Kuran’s boards of directors of which up to four members could be decided by Cryto. Does it mean that in case Cryto nominated 4 board members accounting for half of the members of Kuran, it could share the control with 4 members from 4 other investors? So why Cryto cannot account for Kurran under IFRS11?

    June 28, 2020 at 3:58 pm #574871
    Stephen Widberg
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 16
    • Replies: 3411
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. [IFRS 11:7]

    So, if there is contractually agreed sharing of control and each party has the right of veto, it will be a JA. And, if there isn’t, it won’t be.

    June 29, 2020 at 4:21 am #574902
    Vu
    Member
    • Topics: 46
    • Replies: 87
    • ☆☆

    @stephenwidberg said:
    Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. [IFRS 11:7]

    So, if there is contractually agreed sharing of control and each party has the right of veto, it will be a JA. And, if there isn’t, it won’t be.

    Dear Sir,

    based on your above response, I understand that as the question mentions:

    “There is no shareholder agreement as to how Kurran should be operated or who will make the operating decisions for Kurran” => It means that the contractually agree sharing of control does not exists so Kurran is not JA of Crypto. Is it right?

    June 29, 2020 at 12:08 pm #575085
    Stephen Widberg
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 16
    • Replies: 3411
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    1. No agreement AND
    2. Other parties do not have right of veto

    So that’s 2 reasons why it’s not a JA

    Bear in mind that a candidate who wrote down the relevant knowledge but applied it incorrectly would get most of the marks.

    What lets people down is if they show no knowledge.

    Knowledge 50%
    Application 25%
    Calculations 25%

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • julio99 on Impairments – Impairment (CGU) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on EPS – diluted EPS Example – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • DeborahProspect on ACCA SBR Specimen Exam 2 Question 1
  • darshan.69 on Chapter 9 Pension Schemes TX-UK FA2023

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in