- This topic has 11 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by rui2601.
- The topic ‘*** ACCA Paper ATX September 2019 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.
Instant Poll - Read and post comments:
Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>
Question 1 was so big!
I wrote part A and left 2 pages of space so i could come back to it, then when i came back to it i filled the 2 pages and still had more things to write so couldn’t fit anything else in.
What did people write about for each question?
What did you write about? I did not have much to write about?
i was hoping for a Group Question
I forgot to index the building, last minute done added the indexation but my paper was a mess.
I felt for a 20 mark question there wasn’t enough to write about for Q1 (a)
Same here, i wrote maybe 3-4 lines for 1ai and around 6-7 lines for 1aii. I didn’t write much in the exam but answered all the questions. I feel like i done bad because i did not write much.
It was a strange exam.
Question 1 was the most pathetic question didn’t make any sense
i have only attempted for 85 marks, last 2 questions were good i am afraid testing of corporation tax was not sufficient.
I felt its difficult, anyone tried the question for base cost calculation of Building?
Question 1 (part – a) was pathetic wasted 45 minutes of the time on this part but still did not write enough . I kept thinking what to write.
because of this part the entire paper was sucked.
I cannot remember both clearly.
On building 2, I used original price of £120000 + index allowance as base cost as it was transferred on NLNG basis , hence transfer price between the groups are irrelevant, the original acquisition price is that base cost, and at time disposal, IA is given.
On building1, I cannot remember the figure, but involves work out rollover relief on the warehouse 1st , then building 1 acquisition price need to less then rollover relief to reduce the base cost. at last apply index allowance to get the final figure.
I am not sure if this was correct approach or not.