Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AFM Advanced Financial Management Forums › *** ACCA Paper AFM March 2019 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 112 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by United Arab Emirates.
- AuthorPosts
- March 8, 2019 at 11:08 am #508480March 8, 2019 at 12:05 pm #508541
Disaster. I read the requirement first and smiling thinking i can do this. But when i read the story what the hell was this. Too many information, i dont know where to start, where to go. Even no 3 is confusing af. Seems like acca dont want me to pass this paper.
March 8, 2019 at 12:39 pm #508544Planning on writing June.. Ya’ll better have good news 🙁
March 8, 2019 at 1:41 pm #508556Questions are sooo confusing!!! Why intentionally make it hard to even figure out what they’re asking??
March 8, 2019 at 1:49 pm #508559Omg yes I thought I could do Q1looked good until I started I even left 3 coz I thought one was good wasted too much time tgat my q3 was speed game
March 8, 2019 at 1:50 pm #508560Acca please give us an extra 15 min it will stop the instant panic with your overly long questions
March 8, 2019 at 1:54 pm #508561Tricky calculations that needed time to plan how to tackle them. Other question requirements were not clear. Too difficult compared to 2 previous exams sessions. Disaster!!! Will be back on June.
March 8, 2019 at 1:58 pm #508562Anybody remembers the answers they got?
I think Q1 the WA Cost of Equity was around 8.80%.
Anybody else with the same answer?
March 8, 2019 at 2:16 pm #508570how to calculate risk free rate in q1?
March 8, 2019 at 2:16 pm #508571Absolute disaster, have not come accross any past questions like the question 1 and question 3 previously, and I have done all the exams questions available. Infact, I have not even come across tutorial notes like for question 1 (b). Will definitly be resitting this in June. Hope ACCA make the paper more realisticly passable and understandable then.
March 8, 2019 at 2:37 pm #508577Do people usually attempt for the professional marks for question 1?
Even if I was comfortable with the whole paper, I couldn’t do it. Just not enough time!
March 8, 2019 at 3:11 pm #508587– Question 1 was lengthy but was confusing. I got 16% as my cost of equity, 6% as my cost of debt (assuming that Rf for only year 4 bond was to be considered, I ignored *the to be calculated as it wasn’t needed). I got WACC equal to 9%.
– Question 2 was confusing as it’s my weakest topic in p4.
– In question 3: I got 60% as a gain percentage for the acquirer. I’m not sure if it’s right.March 8, 2019 at 3:13 pm #508588i got about 8.8 for Ke, hope its good and
0.85 for project specific betaMarch 8, 2019 at 3:15 pm #508589I rounded off my figures to 9%. Did you calculate the yield rates?
March 8, 2019 at 3:19 pm #508593How did you calculate the asset beta of new construction project in Question 1 part b-2.
March 8, 2019 at 3:23 pm #508595By calculating the asset beta of larger company and taking only 20% of it. Then calculating asset beta of the other company. At the end taking 50% of both and adding them to get overall asset beta.
March 8, 2019 at 3:24 pm #508596I think the Asset beta was around 1.135. This is after calculating the yield rates and getting the PV of the bond using that 6% bond.
Cost of equity was 8.8. I left the cost of Debt part.
And in Q2 Forwards and Futures was close to 3.9% effective rate. Collars too were close to that I feel.
Anybosy else?
March 8, 2019 at 3:25 pm #508597Finally interest rate risk mgt but it would have been really wonderful if they gave for options too making that a whole 20 marks.
Part b was quite okay partly but no idea about smoothing.. And part c.. Damn delta and gamma…
Question 1 requirements looked very easy, apart from (c). But omg… Was it lengthy! And annual spot yield calcs were a mess.. Took so much time and ran way beyond 1.5 hrs… I really hope I’ve managed to score enough for whatever input for questions 1 and 2 because barely got time to write for question 3. Parts a and c were quite okay but didn’t get time to write well for that… Time was up. 🙁December paper was so much better. I don’t understand why they make the papers so lengthy. 15 mins of reading and planning converted into writing time doesn’t really mean they should just keep on making the paper lengthy. And question 1 the estimates section, they could have allocated more marks maybe because of the amount of calculations?
This was definitely a hard and lengthy paper.March 8, 2019 at 3:30 pm #508599Calculated asset beta for construction for V Co and for T Co, whichever the name was, asset beta for it and an average of both asset betas.
First year annual spot yield 3%..?
Cost of debt 3.75% and wacc 9%. Was 8.8 something %. And cost of equity was 8. Something % I thinkAnd question 2 collars were most beneficial. Anyone else?
What was it for the section b for question 2 please?
March 8, 2019 at 3:34 pm #508600@mahaw said:
– Question 1 was lengthy but was confusing. I got 16% as my cost of equity, 6% as my cost of debt (assuming that Rf for only year 4 bond was to be considered, I ignored *the to be calculated as it wasn’t needed). I got WACC equal to 9%.
– Question 2 was confusing as it’s my weakest topic in p4.
– In question 3: I got 60% as a gain percentage for the acquirer. I’m not sure if it’s right.But you had to calculate Vd to be used in asset beta formula to calculate risk adjusted Be in order to use in CAPM for Ke, no?
And to calculate Vd the annual spot yield was needed to calculate current mv of bond per $100?March 8, 2019 at 3:38 pm #508602In Q1-b. cost of debt was risk free rate from one year bond + 1.29% credit spread = 3+1.29 = 4.29%?
Also was there net asset of target company in Q3 to calculate minimum acceptable bid?
March 8, 2019 at 3:42 pm #508603What was the mark allocation for Q2 options? 16 mark?
What about Q3 mark allocation? part b was 10 mark. not sure a and c parts
Q1- a 8 mark, b-1 7 mark, b2 15 mark, b3 5 mark, b4 6 mark, 4 professional marks and part c 5 mark
March 8, 2019 at 3:53 pm #508608Risk free Rate was the Spot Yield rate of year 1 which was 3% I think.
Asset Beta weighted 0.85
MV Bond was around 105… cost of debt the IRR, roughly 5% pre tax.
Cost of capital 9.2 % something
WACC around 9%
Hedging FRA 4.1 was best
Futures 48 contractsMarch 8, 2019 at 3:55 pm #508610@tural199227 said:
In Q1-b. cost of debt was risk free rate from one year bond + 1.29% credit spread = 3+1.29 = 4.29%?Also was there net asset of target company in Q3 to calculate minimum acceptable bid?
I did IRR calculation because it was redeemable .. Oh no… Was it 4.29?
March 8, 2019 at 3:56 pm #508612Which fra did you use? 4-8? Or 4-9? I got confused over the fra rates and say I’ve worked questions with fra during revision time
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.