Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBL Strategic Business Leader Forums › *** ACCA P3 September 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 62 replies, 40 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by zahid.
- AuthorPosts
- September 10, 2016 at 2:42 pm #339687
It was my first sitting for P3 and found this session is very fair. Even it was relativately straightforward , I feel I did not pass it. I missed porter 5 forces with the Porter diamonds, so no 18 mark for Q 1. I do not think I will be able to get 50 out of 82 which is a totally unrealistic approach. I am wondering if I can get any marks :
In Q 1 somewhere but not in section b ) where the examiner requested to use Porter 5 forces I mentioned powerful suppliers as difficulties to enter into new market .
September 10, 2016 at 9:02 pm #339740Thinking to pay again due to ling’s…..long question and just 7 marks for PESTEL…
September 11, 2016 at 1:57 am #339751this is a very fair paper?challenging but difficult to finish all the question?hope i can pass it ?god bless me
September 11, 2016 at 8:06 am #339765Guys
I’ve just found this BBC article about ZARA and the “PULL” method which made Zara a successful company. If anyone is interested in reading a fairly short article about a real life example, please do read this for P3:
September 11, 2016 at 4:59 pm #339944The question is just so long to read. Even with good exam technique one still needs to read the question. It was designed not to be able to answer. That is why I am saying it was a hard exam
September 12, 2016 at 8:51 am #340037I think the paper was fair but i failed to keep up with time ,s othe last question was answered in a general way due to time management
September 13, 2016 at 10:07 am #340309On Q1, I spent a lot time on PESTEL only to realise it carried 7 marks.I really blame myself for not checking on mark allocation at first.Otherwise q1 was fair but too long full of unnecessary data.
September 13, 2016 at 11:20 am #340314Can someone tell me if ACCA gives marks about explation of what is suitability and acceptability?
September 13, 2016 at 11:43 am #340318@sankenga said:
On Q1, I spent a lot time on PESTEL only to realise it carried 7 marks.I really blame myself for not checking on mark allocation at first.Otherwise q1 was fair but too long full of unnecessary data.I was the exact same on the PESTEL analysis. Mentioned something for each one.
Political – Government changes to get public to buy new products.
Environmental – New movement towards green products – Good for LED business proposed as they are deemed to be more green than lights currently on the market
Social – Talked about how socially people are more prone to green products (highlighted in scenario). Again good potential for new LED lights
Technology – Mentioned those new day saving lights they talked about in the magazine in the scenario – Ling needs to keep track of this new technology to maintain competitive advantage
Economic – Place is in a recession – Mentioned they may not have enough residual income to move to LED lights as they are more expensive. Could impact revenues.
Legal – Candescent lights being banned. 60% of current market is for these lights so real potential again for Ling to increase revenue and profitsSeptember 13, 2016 at 6:58 pm #340363hi guys this will be mine next paper to attempt and i like the discussion
September 14, 2016 at 3:40 pm #340518AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
The paper was fair ,the problem was time. i left 16 m in q3 and 9 marks in q2. i am praying for a pass.
September 15, 2016 at 10:59 am #340649I never felt so frustrated about an exam. I can say I knew 100% of the theory tested on Q1, Q3 and Q4, all the models, everything. Here is my timeline:
12:00 Start of exam
12:40 finished the reading of question 1 – went in panic, as it took so long…
13:20 finished the plan for Q1 and PESTEL requirement (7 points).
And I went into panic again – half of the exam was over and I wrote for 7 marks only…
The rest of the exam was very tense, everything was in rush, I didn’t think of professional language and in-depth, just wanted to write as much as possible.In the revision kit 1 point is given to 3 very long sentences and I could not reach that at all.
I really don’t know how one will be able to pass this exam, unless a native speaker and a fast-reading prize winner…I think to give up, really…
September 27, 2016 at 4:37 pm #341898I think this attempt was too easy as whole previous attempted due to all questions have been asked by model so no general discussion questioning tested as previous attempted normally asked .
First question scenario was to difficult and long so I spent far too much time approx 70% time out total on here .
2nd question quite easy but i gave answer as generally due to time .
3rd question i just tested (b)part of answer .Hopeful of scraping a pass due to question 1 InshAllah
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** ACCA P3 September 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.