• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

*** ACCA P3 June 2018 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBL Strategic Business Leader Forums › *** ACCA P3 June 2018 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***

  • This topic has 71 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by sudiptosen.
Viewing 22 posts - 51 through 72 (of 72 total)
← 1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 11, 2018 at 12:58 am #458225
    aaro
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    @finansist said:
    I think we were supposed to use financial figures for most weaknesses and strengths.

    I think the financial figures were pretty exclusively for the SAF part of the question as the figures given only related to the acquisition company (1stLease?).

    Also the SWOT/TOWS parts said explicitly not to mention the SO strategic option, which was the potential acq’n. Just my $0.02.

    June 11, 2018 at 1:15 am #458226
    finansist
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    I agree that Fin. figures for “VLease”(not sure about the exact name of acquiree) were exclusively for SAF. But I think fin figures for FLC and 1stLease could be used to identify S’s and W’s. Anyway I used them, couln’t be the case with everyone. Maybe there were already enough SWOT in the text that I have missed.

    I also didn’t do SO as you mentioned it was made clear that we shouldn’t.

    June 11, 2018 at 10:18 am #458257
    obalolu
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Couldn’t find opportunity

    June 11, 2018 at 1:33 pm #458295
    kidlap123
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    For Q2B i criticised off the shelf system over bespoke system as the customers want to know which oraganisation was raising its funds. Hence bespoke system would be beneficial as it is developed using the requirements of the customers. Am i correct?????

    June 11, 2018 at 1:34 pm #458297
    kidlap123
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    For Q2B i criticised off the shelf system over bespoke system as the customers want to know which oraganisation was raising its funds. Hence bespoke system would be beneficial as it is developed using the requirements of the customers. correct???

    June 11, 2018 at 2:17 pm #458308
    giorgos
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Q1:

    A weakness of the company, as I thought and analyse is the same nature of business that the organisation was doing. Pulling funds and financing other companies, especially private, is quite risky business.

    Generally, the questions, even were a little tricky, were giving you the ability for self-analysis. For last time, P3 was quite good.

    June 11, 2018 at 2:34 pm #458312
    kidlap123
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    For Q2B i criticised off the shelf system over bespoke system as the customers want to know which oraganisation was raising its funds. Hence bespoke system would be beneficial as it is developed using the requirements of the customers. Am i correct?? Please do reply!

    June 11, 2018 at 4:00 pm #458336
    sam200tech
    Participant
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 31
    • ☆

    Trying to remember what I wrote but here is some of what I can remember

    Threat of buyers
    I just spoke about the obesity issue and people looking to eat healthy. Also mentioned about the geographical area and the fact that people only really ate the food from that region

    Threat of new entrants
    I just spoke about the % of the market and how hard it would be to get in due to the restaurants already there. Think there was something about the Government stopping new people but I cant remember

    Threat of Suppliers
    I spoke about how the restaurants in the markets already have a hold over the farmers because they buy their produce and are involved with the factories that produce the likes of the burgers so they would find it hard to get companies willing to supply them.

    Rivalry
    I went into detail about the restaurants and the food they do.

    Substitute’s
    I mentioned that people might not go out and start to cook at home if they want to have a healthier lifestyle

    June 11, 2018 at 4:21 pm #458339
    shivannaroopchan1
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Your point with being unable to budget cashflows due to flexibility allowed is an excellent point! I could have only come up with the decrease in the car leases in their portfolio for weaknesses.

    June 11, 2018 at 4:43 pm #458347
    kidlap123
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Can anyone please answer my question For Q2B i criticised off the shelf system over bespoke system as the customers want to know which oraganisation was raising its funds. Hence bespoke system would be beneficial as it is developed using the requirements of the customers. Am i correct??

    June 11, 2018 at 9:14 pm #458375
    tomas12345
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Exam was about right level

    June 12, 2018 at 10:06 am #458429
    accastudent1986
    Participant
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 124
    • ☆☆

    For weakness in Q1 i stated that allowing customers payment holidays increases risks of unrecoverable debts due to the fact that customers would most likely require the payment break when they have cash flow issues.

    Answered Q3 of section B as felt confident with the benefits management process

    June 12, 2018 at 8:28 pm #458504
    megand
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Bespoke rather than off the shelf?? I think no matter what opinion you gave as long as you had good reasons for your opinion then you would get marks even if it’s not the answer they are looking for…I put off the shelf for cost reasons with possible adaptations to the package when upgraded etc or just selecting an off the shelf option that better suited requirements also as not for profit organisation who had to justify how much they were spending. Not sure if was the answer that is expected but same as many others need to pass or p1 lost also ? good luck everyone

    June 12, 2018 at 9:00 pm #458505
    kidlap123
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Thanks Megand. I justified bespoke software rather than off the shelf because:

    – The customers wanted to know when organisation was raising its funds hence bespoke would be beneficial as it is developed by customers requirements.
    -By developing bespoke software would mean that the organisation would be the supplier (Owner) of the sofware. Hence no escrow agreement would be required as the supplier would not cease trading with the organisation. This would reduce cost.
    – Due to bespoke software being developed through customers requirements this would reduce maintenance cost such as users training as some of the staff would be aware of how to operate the software.
    -The charitable organisation was lacking IT Support, Hence this would have an impact on the functionality of the off the shelf software as it requires technical support to avoid technical hardware/Software faults.

    Hope this is correct and i have justified well! Please do reply if i am correct?

    June 13, 2018 at 12:56 am #458535
    Satria
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆

    I may be wrong, but i think the question seems to require us to justify why off the shelf > bespoke? Or could it be the other way too?

    June 13, 2018 at 3:23 am #458541
    raymond911
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    @eneltonsatria said:
    I may be wrong, but i think the question seems to require us to justify why off the shelf > bespoke? Or could it be the other way too?

    You are right. COTS is always better than bespoke in terms of cost, quick implementation,less errors. Examiner always prefers COTS or COTS with some part of customized.

    June 14, 2018 at 11:17 am #458728
    rachaelcrossan
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Hi everyone,

    In Q1 part c , I didn’t see the separate table of figures therefore I didn’t do any numerical work for this part. I wonder if I will lose many marks for this? Also , everyone is saying they used SAF for this part whereas I used the BCG and Ashridge portfolio matrix to evaluate. Does anyone have any idea if this is appropriate?

    Thanks,

    June 14, 2018 at 11:54 am #458731
    Satria
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆

    @rachaelcrossan said:
    Hi everyone,

    In Q1 part c , I didn’t see the separate table of figures therefore I didn’t do any numerical work for this part. I wonder if I will lose many marks for this? Also , everyone is saying they used SAF for this part whereas I used the BCG and Ashridge portfolio matrix to evaluate. Does anyone have any idea if this is appropriate?

    Thanks,

    Yeah i do believe BCG and Ashridge can answer 1c. Did you also explain any similar points like the ones for SAF ie. Using financial datas? If yes, youre on the safe side.

    June 18, 2018 at 4:05 pm #459252
    shivannaroopchan1
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    @kidlap123 said:
    Thanks Megand. I justified bespoke software rather than off the shelf because:

    – The customers wanted to know when organisation was raising its funds hence bespoke would be beneficial as it is developed by customers requirements.
    -By developing bespoke software would mean that the organisation would be the supplier (Owner) of the sofware. Hence no escrow agreement would be required as the supplier would not cease trading with the organisation. This would reduce cost.
    – Due to bespoke software being developed through customers requirements this would reduce maintenance cost such as users training as some of the staff would be aware of how to operate the software.
    -The charitable organisation was lacking IT Support, Hence this would have an impact on the functionality of the off the shelf software as it requires technical support to avoid technical hardware/Software faults.

    Hope this is correct and i have justified well! Please do reply if i am correct?

    From what I remember, I believe they asked us to justify using COTS over Bespoke Software.

    June 18, 2018 at 7:40 pm #459327
    megand
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    I don’t know what the wrong or right answer is, if your decision of either off the shelf option or bespoke is justified with reasons why then will gain marks. Let’s just hope we’ve passed 🙂 so pleased no studying for a while, good luck on results day.

    June 21, 2018 at 6:55 am #459551
    rrahmati1
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Hi All.

    Today, I have received email from ACCA saying, “Get ready for Strategic Business Leader”. does it mean that I might not have passed P3 in Jun18 session. ?

    June 21, 2018 at 6:04 pm #459647
    sudiptosen
    Participant
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 110
    • ☆☆

    I think it is a general communication from ACCA. Have received also

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 22 posts - 51 through 72 (of 72 total)
← 1 2 3
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • NirajNathani99 on PPE – revaluation upwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • AKN1989 on Linear Programming – Maximum contribution – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • Motsotase910 on Contingent Assets and Liabilities – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Kim Smith on ACCA F2 Key to success

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in