Forums › ACCA Forums › General ACCA Forums › *** ACCA P1 December 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 76 replies, 45 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
ematete2005.
- AuthorPosts
- December 7, 2016 at 7:13 pm #362018
I thought the questions were ambiguous and quite misleading, I found them hard to answer… Oh well retake … Again
December 7, 2016 at 7:27 pm #362022Hi,
I had used the likelihood consequences framework? is that incorrect?
December 7, 2016 at 7:27 pm #362023Would you say that this sitting was more knowledge-oriented or judgement-oriented?
I though it was supposed to be 50-50% but I found it more knowledge leaning. Personally I would desire more judgement from the requirements.
What do you think?
December 7, 2016 at 7:38 pm #362025What question are you referring to?
December 7, 2016 at 7:39 pm #362027Hey I would say leaning towards a pass…. but quite tentatively. If I do fail it would be like a 48/49. If I do pass it would be like a 50/51.
December 7, 2016 at 7:43 pm #362030But wasnt it already a two tiered board???? there was the lower level and senior level
December 7, 2016 at 7:44 pm #362031My threats were self interest, intimidation and familiarity
December 7, 2016 at 7:53 pm #362034@christa316 said:
My threats were self interest, intimidation and familiarityThat’s the three I identified too.
December 7, 2016 at 8:14 pm #36203990% of The requirements to the question were sooooooo……. CONFUSING..
I found it hard to interprete most of the question requirements.
How could the Examiner make the report iquestion even horrible yet it had the professional mks….??
To be honest, I was following ma instinct while answering coz the confusion was tooooo much…..
Keeping fingers crossed for the nest….
December 7, 2016 at 8:26 pm #362044Hi
Do you thing the risk assessment in Q2 or 3 am not sure would be the risk mapping?December 7, 2016 at 8:50 pm #362053My first ACCA exam, I decided to do question 3 and 4 first, found them pretty straightforward and reckon I got some solid marks. Although I agree with those saying that there didn’t seem to much differentiation between 4a and 4b. I pretty much repeated myself and I doubt will gain many marks for that.
Question 1 was brutal for me, I was tired by the time I got to it and the amount of reading threw me. Found it hard to extract what they wanted. I didn’t practice any case study questions so I only have myself to blame. If I scraped 15 marks out of 50 I’d be grateful.
Feel drained and disappointed. I’m not expecting a pass. Fingers crossed the marker is drinking heavily when they get to my paper.
December 7, 2016 at 10:17 pm #362061Anonymous
Inactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 35
- ☆
For the ethical decision part of question 4, I applied ethical decision making (4 steps) rather than AAA, which is 7 steps. Considering it was 5 marks I felt it was more appropriate, plus I was pressed for time. Hope I can be fully credited for it, as it felt appropriate to the scenario.
December 7, 2016 at 11:24 pm #362074@montelik said:
For the ethical decision part of question 4, I applied ethical decision making (4 steps) rather than AAA, which is 7 steps. Considering it was 5 marks I felt it was more appropriate, plus I was pressed for time. Hope I can be fully credited for it, as it felt appropriate to the scenario.Which part of question 4?
I mentioned only PICCO, Self interest, familarity and intimidation. I dont see how people have used AAA or tucker? Im baffled. Someone remember the requirements.?
December 7, 2016 at 11:32 pm #362076@vipulv said:
Which part of question 4?I mentioned only PICCO, Self interest, familarity and intimidation. I dont see how people have used AAA or tucker? Im baffled. Someone remember the requirements.?
4c) something about explaining the steps Andy should take in order to resolve the ethical dilemma.
I don’t see how tucker or AAA would fit. I mentioned consulting with ACCA, review legal requirements, look at internal policies.
4a and 4b were the annoying ones. Both very similar and 10 marks which implies 5 ethical threats. I got 3 threats and a dubious 4th.
December 8, 2016 at 1:20 am #362087I think I did ok overall. Good to know am not the only one who was really struggling with the letter, felt like I was regurgitating a lot already stated in that essay of a scenario we have to read. Might as well have written, “Hey shareholders, we love you and always will, yours truly, Sarah Moor”
Time keeping is so difficult, I actually tried being as strict as possible to dedicate 1.8 minutes per mark, sadly my hand has a mind of its own and just kept on writing when I needed to move on to the next bit. Only had half an hour to do Q4, really didn’t write as much as I needed to 🙁
December 8, 2016 at 1:32 am #362088@strwbrrblonde said:
Some questions, especially #4, were very confusing. It seemed to me that all the parts were requesting the same…Some strange mix of questions in Q#1. Strange purpose of the letter, strange everything 🙂
Same to me..this question really confuse me..still hoping to pass
December 8, 2016 at 1:38 am #362090Question 3 risk management 8 marks I described the Tara framework. Anyone else? Wondering if I’m barking up the wrong tree!
Also to people who did question 3 what were the environmental concerns in the first part and what did you write about integrated reporting? Have no idea how to get the 8 marks for that part.
Question 2 people are saying they wrote what comprises good info but the question said explain how good info is useful…..so I didn’t so much write about the qualities….maybe I’ve mistook the question….didn’t have that much to write!
Similar thoughts on question 1….letter question terrible…had nothing much more to say ran short on time and who knows how well I’ve done.
Also only just realised that I did not tick the boxes on the front of the exam paper to say which questions I have attempted is this a problem?!
December 8, 2016 at 2:14 am #362095Fluffyduck, yea I did question 3, first part can’t fully remember what I wrote, I used the TARA framework too for risk management bit, almost certain that was the correct approach.
The final bit on integrated reporting, I did a lot of standard bookwork on writing about the guiding principles of an integrated report, the benefits it can provide to different stakeholders. The question was actually very similar to a past paper. The sample answer of which essentially briefly described each type of the 6 capitals and then applied it to the case. The question mentioned an oil disaster previously, fairly sure it was hinted at the BP disaster, which was what I based my university dissertation on(winding back the years), so I didn’t find too much trouble on apply the scenario to the answer.
I hope the marker will be ticking many of my points on question 3 to make up for some of my not so great answers for Q1 and Q4.
December 8, 2016 at 2:23 am #362096Good to hear you used the same framework!
I thought I got the 6 capitals correct until I came out and saw I got two wrong…don’t know what happened to my brain in the exam!!
I’m hopeful that maybe I have scraped through but very uncertain. Ambiguous questions throughout and didn’t like topic ranges too much either.Good luck to you and everyone else
December 8, 2016 at 2:46 am #362102Anonymous
Inactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 14
- ☆
@dd92 said:
4c) something about explaining the steps Andy should take in order to resolve the ethical dilemma.I don’t see how tucker or AAA would fit. I mentioned consulting with ACCA, review legal requirements, look at internal policies.
4a and 4b were the annoying ones. Both very similar and 10 marks which implies 5 ethical threats. I got 3 threats and a dubious 4th.
I think it says the steps Andy should’ve taken.
I also doubt either AAA or Tucker ModelsDecember 8, 2016 at 3:05 am #362104Hi uzair52,
For the first part of question 3 a, what did you write regarding sources of environmental risk that they would discover during the risk assessment?
Regarding risk management framework, I used COSO framework but not sure if this is the correct one.
December 8, 2016 at 4:29 am #362107It was a bit funny for me. After completing Question 1 & 3, i was still to decide one amongst 2&4. I read Q2 first and then read Q4, made up my mind to go for Q2. But when I started answering, Q4 scenario was still on my mind because that was last read question. I started answering Q2 questions for Q4 scenarios for about 3 mins. I was like OMG!!
December 8, 2016 at 4:41 am #362109Hi sahir,
Regarding q 3 a what did you write regarding sources of environmental risk that they will discover during assessment? I was a bit confused regarding that part.
December 8, 2016 at 5:04 am #362112@fatimasaid123 said:
Hi sahir,Regarding q 3 a what did you write regarding sources of environmental risk that they will discover during assessment? I was a bit confused regarding that part.
I’m interested in this too. What points did you make Fatima?
December 8, 2016 at 5:14 am #362113I mainly describe how their activities pose environmental risk.
For example, I wrote extracting oil , a non-renewable resource, would contribute to it being depleted as it can not be replaced.
I also wrote that through processing of oil, environmental footprint and risk that arises include carbon being emitted.
Another point I wrote is that environmental risk also includes impact of the environment on the firm such as adverse weather conditions,earthquakes and so on damaging oil rigs leading to a possible explosion.
Regarding ways to mitigate impact, I mentioned developing more robust oil rigs so that it will be able to withstand strong waves and not explode as was the case with BP.
I also wrote that they should install carbon capture system and spill containment.
But I am not sure whether these were points that examiners were looking for.
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** ACCA P1 December 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.