Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FM Financial Management Forums › *** ACCA F9 March 2018 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 127 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by George.
- AuthorPosts
- March 9, 2018 at 7:44 pm #441901
I went thru open tuition lectures, even revised thru complete open tuition notes π
March 9, 2018 at 7:46 pm #441902I studied through kaplan and opentuitions
March 9, 2018 at 7:52 pm #441904@prasu83 said:
Growth was 2.8 or 3%As far as i remember
D 5 yrs ago .2
Latest .23
.2x (1+g)=.23
G= .23/.2 sq root 4 -1
=3.555
=3.6 %March 9, 2018 at 7:56 pm #441905@kanchandhankar said:
As far as i remember
D 5 yrs ago .2
Latest .23
.2x (1+g)=.23
G= .23/.2 sq root 4 -1
=3.555
=3.6 %That’s what I got!
March 9, 2018 at 7:56 pm #441906@kanchandhankar said:
As far as i remember
D 5 yrs ago .2
Latest .23
.2x (1+g)=.23
G= .23/.2 sq root 4 -1
=3.555
=3.6 %I reckon i’ve slipped up on my calculator to get 2.9% somehow, but clearly wrote out that exact working in my answer – annoying!
March 9, 2018 at 8:00 pm #441907@juliat said:
That’s what I got!Good to know π
With this growth
I got cost of equity 10.4=.23 (1+.036)/3.50 +.036
=.104 x
=10.4 %March 9, 2018 at 8:02 pm #441908@bg12321 said:
I reckon i’ve slipped up on my calculator to get 2.9% somehow, but clearly wrote out that exact working in my answer – annoying!I am sure you will get marks of those working even if answer growth was wrong
March 9, 2018 at 8:14 pm #441909This march 2018 F9 is really disaster. I can imagine myself reading for June again after all the effort I have put in for this paper, 24/7 reading. I never pay attention to joint probability I ready the study text from chapter 1-20. In fact the examiner need to summon.
Secondly MCQ is another thing the ACCA need to review.March 9, 2018 at 8:16 pm #441910@kanchandhankar said:
I am sure you will get marks of those working even if answer growth was wrongGood luck with your results!
March 9, 2018 at 8:19 pm #441911@kanchandhankar said:
Good to know π
With this growth
I got cost of equity 10.4=.23 (1+.036)/3.50 +.036
=.104 x
=10.4 %Agrh! I know where I went wrong. I stupidly did not add the growth at the end ?????????? But yes, agree with your figures π
March 9, 2018 at 8:19 pm #441912Joint probability was a shocker! No normal investment appraisal question. I was banking on section C – but now it looks like I’ll be back again in June.
March 9, 2018 at 9:34 pm #441922I got .036 first when I did it over 4 years, it says 5 years ago so was it not the 5th square root? I changed it at last minute, I got 0.028 growth. So my cost of equity 6.78? My wacc was 10.2% but this changed to 7% I think.. I think my workings were right even if figures ended up a bit wrong? The wordy questions I thought werenβt too bad, just the choice of answers that confused me somewhat! Lots of questions on share market efficiency.
March 9, 2018 at 9:35 pm #441924Did anyone have the hedging questions on a receipt of 2million pesos? What was the dollar cost? My mind went blank I just kept trying to do it as a payment
March 9, 2018 at 9:40 pm #441926@bg12321 said:
Good luck with your results!Thanks
And same to you
Good luck !!March 9, 2018 at 9:42 pm #441927@barbadoshk said:
I got .036 first when I did it over 4 years, it says 5 years ago so was it not the 5th square root? I changed it at last minute, I got 0.028 growth. So my cost of equity 6.78? My wacc was 10.2% but this changed to 7% I think.. I think my workings were right even if figures ended up a bit wrong? The wordy questions I thought werenβt too bad, just the choice of answers that confused me somewhat! Lots of questions on share market efficiency.No it will four period
Year 1-2 , 2-3, 3-4, 4-5 so sq root 4March 9, 2018 at 9:43 pm #441928@juliat said:
Agrh! I know where I went wrong. I stupidly did not add the growth at the end ?????????? But yes, agree with your figures πAh ok
We all make silly mistake like that in 1 question or anotherMarch 9, 2018 at 9:50 pm #441929I understand but it didnβt give years in the form of 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014.. if it were 2018 to 2014 it would read 4 years ago ? But it did say 5 years ago..
March 9, 2018 at 10:00 pm #441930Yes it said 5 years ago
As i understand it
in first year there is no growth
Thats y we do 4 yearsMarch 9, 2018 at 10:10 pm #441931Anyone remember mcq about Yield curve ? I chose last option central bank announced reducing interest rates
Mcq about NRV
There was property receivables inventory goodwill liabilities both current n non currentThere were 2 mcq about NFPs
Annual cost of discount on receivables
2% within 20days total sales was 50m but credit sale was 80% current receivables were 5.68Q about DCF and Non DCF methods
Q about commercial paper discount ?March 9, 2018 at 10:29 pm #441934Absolutely hated the CBE format as it was difficult to show workings. Much preferred paper exams. And the questions asked by the examiner were nothing like those in the approved study text/revision kit. I’m 100% certain that this CBE will be my first fail.
March 9, 2018 at 11:45 pm #441950@sonalsethia said:
Probabilities was very straight forward. Refer to
Open tuition notes. That was easy 6 marks. Looks like we all got different section c. Here in
India we got One section c was probabilities and another one was Debt vs equity finance for business expansion. I felt MCQs were tricky and section C was easy. Except 6 marks for Islamic finance..that was not expectedAlthough I’ve not done a probability question like this, it was logical I think. Not sure I did it correctly but my Npv was quite high. Think 800,000 ish.
Lost all marks on Islamic finance and the 8 marks on risk and uncertainty for an adjusted payback …… had no idea, but hope I did enough on the other bits.
Learning exchange rates an hour before exams really paid off, theres was 2/3 questions on exchange rate.
March 9, 2018 at 11:58 pm #441951The examiner was tough this time I thought, Dec 17 paper wasnβt so bad, (2 marks short of a pass) but this time round he/she seemed to want to catch us out.. really not confident to pass but fingers crossed.
Anyone remember any sect a mcqs?
March 10, 2018 at 12:10 am #441952I had put in much effort on this paper and was so disappointed to see such a section C. December 2017 wasnt half as bad as this one. I wish I had passed then. For the adjusted payback you were meant to explain that you can adjust payback period to reduce the length of project as the longer a project last the more uncertain it becomes. Then the risk adjusted discount factor is just CAPM, the whole ungearing and then regearing process and then using the new beta in the new CAPM.
March 10, 2018 at 3:50 am #441962Section C – joint probability and which source of finance to use to raise capital was easy. The mcqs were really tricky and confusing. I too hope i clear this exam.
March 10, 2018 at 7:25 am #441970Does it mean people writing CBE had total different paper from those of paper based coz I never came across WACC along the whole paper and was expecting it so much together with an NPV…… its a pity coz I’ll be sitting for P2 by June and wasn’t planning on sitting two papers at once
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** ACCA F9 March 2018 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.