Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › *** ACCA F7 March 2018 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 96 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by rasiksharma.
- AuthorPosts
- March 6, 2018 at 6:23 pm #440762
There was a question with $50,000 and $37,000 as options – what was the correct answer?
March 6, 2018 at 6:31 pm #440769i did everything in the spread sheet, yes; where else could you do it? i thought the notepad thing is for me only and nobody reads it..
March 6, 2018 at 6:35 pm #440770@beloslava said:
i did everything in the spread sheet, yes; where else could you do it? i thought the notepad thing is for me only and nobody reads it..I did it in the spreadsheet too, but I just found it weird trying to write proper sentences over the cells! Maybe that was just me! ?
March 6, 2018 at 6:41 pm #440773i literally had 4 minutes to write the comments so the sentences were kinda’ short… but if you have a “wordy” question, excel doesn’t seem the right place to answer it, i guess…i might face that problem tomorrow as i have F5 to sit….
March 6, 2018 at 6:47 pm #440774@beloslava said:
i literally had 4 minutes to write the comments so the sentences were kinda’ short… but if you have a “wordy” question, excel doesn’t seem the right place to answer it, i guess…i might face that problem tomorrow as i have F5 to sit….Good luck with F5, you’ll be fine! I’m not brave enough to try 2 in one sitting!!!
March 6, 2018 at 6:55 pm #440776thanks
March 6, 2018 at 6:55 pm #440777I seems that the exam were kind of mixture. I am looking at your comments, I had Tice Brand and impairment on the paper based exam too, also the ratio to comment (question 31 – gross profit, operation profit margin and interest cover for 9 marks), but no exchange, no ROE. I calculated the interest cover of Perkins in 20X7, like many times above in 20×6 and my comments were that it seems they paid off some substantial interest-bearing debt or Swanson was more geared company. Some like that by anybody else?
March 6, 2018 at 7:08 pm #440781How did you comment the gain on disposal 9,440 included in the operating expenses? Did you get the same result for the gain of disposal in Q31, a)? It was not mentioned when the subsidiary was acquired, right? It was pretty strange question for me. How did you comment renting out the vacated property by the subsidiary? Thank you.
March 6, 2018 at 7:08 pm #440782I didn’t see any gearing information in the question
Can anyone remember any more MCQs that they think they got right ?March 6, 2018 at 7:12 pm #440783I can recall an MCQ with revaluation of property and how should it be apportioned: I chose Cr GW 70,000, Dr PPE 56, Dr RE 8.4, Dr NCI 5.6, I hope that were the figures.
March 6, 2018 at 7:15 pm #440784@erika21 said:
I can recall an MCQ with revaluation of property and how should it be apportioned: I chose Cr GW 70,000, Dr PPE 56, Dr RE 8.4, Dr NCI 5.6, I hope that were the figures.I remember getting a similar answer for an MCQ.
March 6, 2018 at 7:21 pm #440786Q31 was a very strange question
I didn’t know what to do about the disposal. I just removed it from operating expenses as per the question
New rental income I just added to operating expenses
I used the new rental income as a reason why the disposal was a positive thingMarch 6, 2018 at 7:24 pm #440788How did you calculate the new rental income? What gain did you get in part a? My gain was much below 9, 440? I think I didn’t get the question properly.
March 6, 2018 at 7:29 pm #440791Another MCQ: A quick ratio that was much lower than the sector average: I chose something with the receivables allowance
March 6, 2018 at 7:38 pm #440793there was that one sentence in the question that they had a property previously used by the disposed subsidiary for free, that now they lease to somebody and probably receive interest. May be that interest income makes the finance cost smaller, so the interest ratio goes up… because we only had information about their finance cost from the PL statement…
March 6, 2018 at 7:41 pm #440797what does matter how geared Swanson was… we were comparing the parents individual P/Ls, right?
March 6, 2018 at 7:49 pm #440801that “gain on disposal” thing was something like a blur to me at the begining… i calculated good will on aquisition first, so i could deduct it from the disposal proceeds along with the net assets) and then that 9440 (it looked like it was the difference between disposal proceeds and net assets only)- removed it from operating expense…
i am not sure that the calculations are right, neither that this is at all the right aproach… i sort of improvised… didn’t have much time to doubt myself…March 6, 2018 at 7:49 pm #440802@beloslava said:
what does matter how geared Swanson was… we were comparing the parents individual P/Ls, right?Yes, that’s right. Just my interest cover ratio went up dramatically. And swanson finance cost was about 900 where parent’s only about 60, so I mentioned that as well.
March 6, 2018 at 7:51 pm #440804Operating cycle was 57 days i guess
Inventory 5times = 365/5= 73 days
= Inventory+receivables-payables yea?
March 6, 2018 at 7:52 pm #440805what was the rental income? did they say how much it is? i don’t recall anything about that in my paper??? did you have to comment the disposal? my paper asked to compare the STPL of the parent as a single entity…all the ratios i compared was the individual ones
March 6, 2018 at 7:53 pm #440806I calculated GW as well and calculated PL result for Swanson up to sept 20×7 and added to initial consideration. My gain wad about 2m.
March 6, 2018 at 7:56 pm #440808My gain on disposal was smaller too
was your paper or CBE exam?March 6, 2018 at 7:58 pm #440810sounds about right…mine was something like that
March 6, 2018 at 7:59 pm #440811I didn’t calculate the new rental income. I just used it for the analysis
March 6, 2018 at 8:02 pm #440813how about q32?
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** ACCA F7 March 2018 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.