Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › *** ACCA F7 June 2018 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 68 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by Shivvy.
- AuthorPosts
- June 6, 2018 at 5:09 pm #457155
‘In addition, do you consolidate the revaluation surplus of both parent and sub and if so, does any go to NCI’
there was no revaluation surplus. changes in fair value get accounted for in RE and the counter effect is the change in value on the asset/liability. Mayybe the equity investment has a revaluation reserve but thats it
June 6, 2018 at 6:15 pm #457197@shaonan said:
Hey I got section C consolidated statement balanced too. Took the number from investment in S as share consideration tooWas your goodwill number the same as cash consideration ?
Also what is your total asset number ?
June 6, 2018 at 7:04 pm #457217@shaonan
is the value of investment given in the parent sofp. i didnt find. If that was so my total aaset was wrong. but equity+ liabity was as something like 18o____. is it soJune 6, 2018 at 7:14 pm #457220hi i also did the cbe with luxury cheese in dublin, just wondering how they allocate the marks in that question, they give out 14 marks for the analysis part, would it be 2 marks for valid point or 1 mark for valid point?
im worried i didnt write enough, wrote about 3 longish sized paragraphs.also i think the only part i got wrong in the goodwill and ret earnings calculation was the deferred consideration, i got confused by the multiple decimal consideration being part of it so i stupidly panicked and just took 10% from the consideration (i think 10% of 13500). would i still get marks for other workings in ret earnings and goodwill?
also how did other others manage the contingent liabilty? that had me confused tooJune 6, 2018 at 8:00 pm #457242AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 62
- ☆☆
Does anyone remember any of the mcq’s from the cbe?
June 6, 2018 at 9:01 pm #457270Yeh I remember equity+liability being something like 18o____. Contingent liability I accounted for but I think you have to pay attention to when it was, either at acquisition or after?? For ratio questions you get a mark for each pair of ratios correct, so one mark for X6 and X5. + marks are available generously for commenting on each additional point in the question so the additional contracts won etc etc aslong as it makes sense you get a mark
June 6, 2018 at 9:41 pm #457295there was a contingent liability in point 2, that the company provided 800,000 in first year but now it may be 1.2m or something like that.i just left it out as i thought it wasnt a valid provision. never seen a point like that in a practice consolidation!
do you think there is 14 marks for 14 valid points made, seems like a lot of points to make?
my conclusion was that the company could grow if they made a share issue instead of more loan issuessection a and b were pretty hard too i agree, so many questions had me in two minds with the wording of the questions, annoying part is i cant remember many of them specifically to check them!
June 6, 2018 at 10:10 pm #457300@snell123 said:
Does anyone remember any of the mcq’s from the cbe?I was hoping to be able to discuss alot of the multiple choice answers with others but alot the questions are randomly allocated aren’t they? But hopefully there will be some shared ones amongst us.
My mind has gone a bit blank but did anyone have some of these:
– Borrowing costs – was asked when should borrowing costs be capitalised – from when various costs to prepare the land/warehouse for building were incurred (9 months) or from when the warehouse was physically built (9 months)? Loan was in place before both events.
– True/false question about intangible assets being permitted for revaluation or being banned
– Physical capital maintenance question which provided selling price, opening cost and closing cost
– A section A question with 3 project scenarios for development costs asking for total expenses charge to SPL from all 3 projects. I calculated two of the projects fine but one of them I kept getting a strange number based on the time apportioning (5/12) for that project. Did anyone get the correct answer for this.
I had no questions at all in any section on EPS, financial instruments, cash flows, foreign currency – some of my strongest areas! :(. Its meant to be randomised but my MCQ experience was heavily focused on consolidation extracts (which I’m good with too) and alot of the smaller standards (which I’m okay with memory wise).
June 7, 2018 at 4:39 am #457337I had the same question in my cbe but the question was not “if is nci IS valued at fv” rather it was “If nci IS NOT valued at fv which of the following will not be affected….”
@mohdafzal said:
Yes. You are right mostly. but this question was surely not in my exam. Did you give CBE or PAPER based? Mine was paper based.June 7, 2018 at 6:24 am #457348AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 62
- ☆☆
Ok, if nci is not valued at FV, then what is not effected?
Share capital
Goodwill
Retained earnings
NciJune 7, 2018 at 6:45 am #457377AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 62
- ☆☆
Yes I had theses questions:
Physical maintenance mcq was : cost 8 at start of year, valued at 12 at end of year when units sold for 15. Inflation at 10%. What was the profit
I put the 620,000
For the borrowing costs, wasn’t it how much went to p&l? Included depreciation and got 5,500,500
June 7, 2018 at 4:43 pm #457546Are you sure about tge 620000. I wrote tgat but i have a feeling tge correct ans is 550000
June 7, 2018 at 4:54 pm #457558AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- ☆
No I am not sure about my answer. I have been looking all over the internet and my books and cannot find anything in regards to calculating the correct answer.
If anybody knows, please shout
How did you come to your answer?
June 8, 2018 at 11:04 am #457769@mohdafzal said:
Overall … My paper based exam was kind of okay..I was tested on final accounts with an adjustment on short term leases..
But it mentioned that it was 5 years .. so how is that supposed to be short term..
And anyways i didnt know hw it would affect the balance sheet and profit..Interpretations was also confusing..
Since i was not getting points on how to comment on performance.. they had provided very less infoMCQ were good (as far as those options were available for which i think are correct)
Just hoping to pass..
How it was for you all guyzz??
June 11, 2018 at 10:40 am #458263AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- ☆
I think 620,000 is correct – looking at the BPP Study Text:
Inventory Sold Value 800,000 *(1.1/1) = 880,000
Selling 1,500,000 *(1.1/1.1) = 1,500,0001,500,000 – 880,000 = 620,000
June 11, 2018 at 11:34 am #458278MCQ were good (as far as those options were available for which i think are correct)
Section C is disaster for meJust hoping to pass..
How it was for you all guyzz??
June 11, 2018 at 11:51 am #458280AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 8
- ☆
Yes Section C was a disaster for me as well – Was hoping for a nice consolidation question but got the trial balance question 🙁
Anyone else remember any MCQ’s?
June 12, 2018 at 4:55 pm #458483This exam paper was okay. It gave a fair chance at success to anyone who was excellently prepared as well as those not excellently, but sufficiently prepared nevertheless.
June 18, 2018 at 9:52 am #459226ws it for sec C?
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** ACCA F7 June 2018 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.