Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA PM Performance Management Forums › *** ACCA F5 December 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 91 replies, 40 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by laughingcoffin.
- AuthorPosts
- December 8, 2016 at 12:28 pm #362212
Cbaccbabdddbbaaddabcbdbacbdbca
These were my answers to the mcqs and mtqs, in order from 1-30. Fingers crossed and would really appreciate it if someone can tele it with me. Best of luck to everyone.
December 8, 2016 at 12:28 pm #362213I think i got roi calculation wrong…. wat abt u guys… was yeild variance adverse???
December 8, 2016 at 12:32 pm #362216When will acca upload question paper and its answers?
December 8, 2016 at 12:33 pm #362218In q32, Gain on sale of asset, and cost of closure of company were both excluded because we were supposed to assess the divisional managers performance as asked in the question and both of these decisions were made by the head office, thus uncontrollable. Excluded depreciation on exchange rate too.
December 8, 2016 at 12:54 pm #362220You had to work out the difference between the revenues of each quarter. the revenue of Q1 was 98% of Q2, so you had to Divide the revenue of Q2 by 98% to get the budgeted revenue of Q3 and so on.
Exchange rates cant be controlled by Managers so shouldnt by in calc, Trading profit should have been used.
December 8, 2016 at 12:57 pm #362222What were the percentage of ROI of q 32???
December 8, 2016 at 12:58 pm #362223I guess i got one around 18% and one 12% …
December 8, 2016 at 5:03 pm #362326Anyone else remembers the questions?
1. Optimal plan for cakes while 220 gram available
2. Optimal plan for marathon for $55 and $30…
3. EV is not sensitive to probabilities.
4. ZBB – not building up previous inefficiencies, or smth like thisDecember 8, 2016 at 5:32 pm #362349@azaramirov said:
Anyone else remembers the questions?
1. Optimal plan for cakes while 220 gram available
2. Optimal plan for marathon for $55 and $30…
3. EV is not sensitive to probabilities.
4. ZBB – not building up previous inefficiencies, or smth like this2) The option that had 17000 something and 20000
3) I picked that it doesnt show all the outcomes and there was one option related to profitDecember 8, 2016 at 6:28 pm #362397@azaramirov said:
Anyone else remembers the questions?
1. Optimal plan for cakes while 220 gram available
2. Optimal plan for marathon for $55 and $30…
3. EV is not sensitive to probabilities.
4. ZBB – not building up previous inefficiencies, or smth like thisHey, I posted my answers to these. I got:
1.Optimal plan was the option with 0 muffins that can’t be made and i think 120 brownies.
2. Marathon optimal plan I got the same as Msarosh option A with 17540 and 20000
3. I picked the option that EV is sensitive to probability assumptions (in my opinion) and it that it also doesn’t show all outcomes. It depends precisely on assumptions about probabilities, how low or high it is at each decision point to get to the EV for a decision in the first place..so assumptions about the probabilities would affect it (in my opinion).
4. ZBB – You are right, it doesn’t build up from previous inefficiencies. I can’t remember the other options now but it’s definitely doesn’t build up from inefficiencies.What did everyone else put for the joint production profit/loss for product X? after the cut off point?
And throughput ratio – how to improve TPAR to do with products Y and Z?
December 8, 2016 at 6:41 pm #362405@heychi said:
Hey, I posted my answers to these. I got:1.Optimal plan was the option with 0 muffins that can’t be made and i think 120 brownies.
2. Marathon optimal plan I got the same as Msarosh option A with 17540 and 20000
3. I picked the option that EV is sensitive to probability assumptions (in my opinion) and it that it also doesn’t show all outcomes. It depends precisely on assumptions about probabilities, how low or high it is at each decision point to get to the EV for a decision in the first place..so assumptions about the probabilities would affect it (in my opinion).
4. ZBB – You are right, it doesn’t build up from previous inefficiencies. I can’t remember the other options now but it’s definitely doesn’t build up from inefficiencies.What did everyone else put for the joint production profit/loss for product X? after the cut off point?
And throughput ratio – how to improve TPAR to do with products Y and Z?
To improve TRAP- first one was accepting discount…
Was baking or mixing bottleneck?
What about life cycle cost per unit? do you remember?
Also investigation cost for the activity…December 8, 2016 at 7:11 pm #362419@heychi said:
Hey, I posted my answers to these. I got:1.Optimal plan was the option with 0 muffins that can’t be made and i think 120 brownies.
2. Marathon optimal plan I got the same as Msarosh option A with 17540 and 20000
3. I picked the option that EV is sensitive to probability assumptions (in my opinion) and it that it also doesn’t show all outcomes. It depends precisely on assumptions about probabilities, how low or high it is at each decision point to get to the EV for a decision in the first place..so assumptions about the probabilities would affect it (in my opinion).
4. ZBB – You are right, it doesn’t build up from previous inefficiencies. I can’t remember the other options now but it’s definitely doesn’t build up from inefficiencies.What did everyone else put for the joint production profit/loss for product X? after the cut off point?
And throughput ratio – how to improve TPAR to do with products Y and Z?
Didnt the option say INsensitive to probability and not sensitive?
December 8, 2016 at 7:21 pm #362421I think it is insensitive too. What about the mixing or baking… which one is bottleneck?
December 8, 2016 at 8:55 pm #362449I totally agree with you. The examiner definately had me on the MTQs. TBH, they were challenging but even worst time consuming and required a great deal of time to decode; that I didn’t do well. Section C wasn’t bad at all; I hope I scored enough on section C to make up for the poor performance on the MTQs.
December 8, 2016 at 9:08 pm #362080Hey guys! So here are the MCQs that I can remember (in no order):
1. The flow cost question – I put waste
2. The closed system question – I put control test or whatever the control answer was.
3. Services for the eye care -Simultaneous
4. $592000 BE sales
5. Reason for the favourable variance? – I put the ingredients used in actual were less that expected and that’s why..
6. $590 transfer price (c)
7. Which is the bottleneck for the mixing, baking etc?
8. Optimal Marathon plan was Answer A with 17540 and i think 20something thousand.
9. Optimal plan for the cakes and muffins and brownies – I chose the only answer with i think either 0 muffins or something. It was the only answer with 0 in it though i think it was C. 120 of brownies were made I remember…
10. Breakeven question about if the selling price and variable costs and something else increased for the 10km race – I put BE is unchanged but profit goes up 10%.
11. Total Materials price VAR – I got $40.50 Averse
12. I got $17.43 cost per unit for one ABC costing question about inspections…
13. There was a question about the EV and it’s sensitivity to probability assumptions. I think I put it’s sensitive to probability assumptions as it does assume a lot. I picked that and the other option about ignoring the variable outcomes that can occur.
14. One question about ZBB being functional and something else. I think another option was ZBB built on previous budget which i thought was wrong as that’s incremental.
15. The question about the Least safest way to handle highly secure info.
16. A question about whether the materials mix was treated as usage or something..
17. Materiels yield Variance
18. The joint products question of X and Y – I think I picked $400 gain but not sure.
19. The question about what the manager in the investment centre is responsible for – I put costs, revenues, and transfer price.
20. The question in order to improve TPAR with Y and Z? I think I chose A to increase selling price of Y by 10%..not sure on this one.
21. TPAR ratio was 1.5..something and the reason it must have happenedThat’s all I can remember for the MCQ’s.
31a) Construct the rolling budget
b) The problems they were having before and how Rolling budget would help.
c) The problems the manager might face of implementing the rolling budget.32a) Calculate the ROI
b) Explain why certain costs have been excluded from the calculation in part a)
c) Explain the problems with using ROI as a performance measurement.I found this paper very challenging but doable. Much more challenging that the September one which looks like a walk in the park compared to this one. Not much variety of topics either. This was my second Attempt – got 47% last time. Kicking myself over that paper as I really should have passed it..just made silly mistakes.
Ah well!
December 8, 2016 at 9:08 pm #3624141.Which problems could arise applying Rolling budget?
2.Which problems for ROI calculation?December 8, 2016 at 11:53 pm #362489Ok so I have this question for all of you that put 0 muffins or brownies on the throughput question and I would really appreciate if someone can clear this out for me.
Didn’t the data in the question specifically ask us to honour the contract we had with the cafe and to provide them first and foremost? It had a minimum amount of cupcakes, brownies and Muffins that the cafe required, so how could your answers have 0 muffins or cupcakes?
Or am I just being delusional here and we only had to focus on the OPP? :/December 9, 2016 at 9:01 am #3625691. For preparing rolling budget should we take the percentage on quarter 4 budgeted values or the actual budget values?
2. In the throughput first question, what is the bottleneck- weighing, mixing or none.
December 9, 2016 at 9:19 am #362491@azaramirov said:
1.Which problems could arise applying Rolling budget?
2.Which problems for ROI calculation?I put:
1. Resistance to change, Inexperience of the MD who would need to consider costs of hiring expertise to help with the transition. I also put rolling budgets will be required to be produced more frequently than the staff are used to, and are expected to be more accurate and up to date. This would require more responsibility accounting, and more time dedicated to budgeting. Some staff may perceive that badly…
2. I spoke about goal congruence issue. There’s also an issue with depreciation I think of old assets that could make the ROI look favourable? So keeping old assets rather than improving them could be tempting for managers..which wouldn’t be good for the company as a whole.. I only put down the issue with goal congruence though as in the exam, that was all i could think of to talk about..!
December 9, 2016 at 10:43 am #362588@ahmadsaad143 said:
Ok so I have this question for all of you that put 0 muffins or brownies on the throughput question and I would really appreciate if someone can clear this out for me.
Didn’t the data in the question specifically ask us to honour the contract we had with the cafe and to provide them first and foremost? It had a minimum amount of cupcakes, brownies and Muffins that the cafe required, so how could your answers have 0 muffins or cupcakes?
Or am I just being delusional here and we only had to focus on the OPP? :/Yes the question did say that the minimum demand for cupcakes, brownies and muffins must be met. They had given us the minimum and maximum demand for each of them
December 9, 2016 at 11:35 am #362601@msarosh said:
Yes the question did say that the minimum demand for cupcakes, brownies and muffins must be met. They had given us the minimum and maximum demand for each of themHowever, the question mentioned that “in order to maximize the profit” or smth like that, so we had to rise the limits to the maximum (my opinion).
Anybody made sure which bottleneck it was ? mixing, weighing or what?
December 9, 2016 at 12:14 pm #362608@ahmadsaad143 said:
Ok so I have this question for all of you that put 0 muffins or brownies on the throughput question and I would really appreciate if someone can clear this out for me.
Didn’t the data in the question specifically ask us to honour the contract we had with the cafe and to provide them first and foremost? It had a minimum amount of cupcakes, brownies and Muffins that the cafe required, so how could your answers have 0 muffins or cupcakes?
Or am I just being delusional here and we only had to focus on the OPP? :/I focused on the OPP. The paragraph said they had a minimum and maximum demand they had to produce as far as I’m aware..
Although they said the minimum must be met, the question specifically asked what is the optimal production plan (with only 120 or something minutes/hours left) in order to maximize the profit.
I got my answer by finding the contribution for each cake, and then dividing by the limiting factor i.e hours/minutes to find amount of contribution per limiting factor.
The biggest contributor gets made first.The demand I used was the maximum expected demand. After I did that, there was no time to make any muffins.
The same thing happened in September paper I think where people said to honor the contract..I found the answer was asking to focusing on the OPP as normal and then using the Maximum expected demand (including the contract). So in this case, that’s what I did.
This is only my answer and opinion though.
December 9, 2016 at 9:29 pm #362851hi, any idea when the december sitting paper will be posted?
December 9, 2016 at 10:26 pm #362861@msarosh said:
Yes the question did say that the minimum demand for cupcakes, brownies and muffins must be met. They had given us the minimum and maximum demand for each of themYes and so according to that information, weren’t we supposed to produce at least a batch of all 3 items to meet minimum demand first and then manage the remaining hours according to the OPP?
December 9, 2016 at 10:32 pm #362864@azaramirov said:
However, the question mentioned that “in order to maximize the profit” or smth like that, so we had to rise the limits to the maximum (my opinion).Anybody made sure which bottleneck it was ? mixing, weighing or what?
Dude you make absolute sense but aren’t the mtqs supposed to be treated according to the scenario provided at the start of question and not independently on its own? I basically used that approach to meet minimum demand first.
And if I remember correctly, the bottleneck was mixing.
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** ACCA F5 December 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.