- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 months ago by
John Moffat.
John Moffat.Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
-
Posts
-
mahdialhadhrami
- Topics: 2
- Replies: 0
- ☆
Dear John,
Regarding (Q 256 Truffle Co) the revised labour efficiency hours 10250 * 1.2% = 12300 Standard Revised Hours as per correct answer, whereas I believe the revised Labour hours Shall be calculate 10250 / 0.8 = 12812.5 because the question didn’t say the labour will need extra time by 20 %.
Appreciate to explain why they multiply by 1.2 % instead divided by 0.8?
John Moffat
- Topics: 57
- Replies: 49606
- ☆☆☆☆☆
The question does say that it will be 20% slower and therefore the examiners answer has added 20% to the original standard time taken.
mahdialhadhrami
John MoffatViewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.