• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

2014 June Q3

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AFM Advanced Financial Management Forums › 2014 June Q3

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 2, 2015 at 9:51 am #286931
    faniacca
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Dear John,

    Value of spinning off department B:

    Present value of year 1 $7.62m X 120% X 0.909 = $8.31m
    Present value of year 2 onwards $9.14m X (1+5.2%)/(10%-5.2%) x 0.909= $ 182.11

    The year 1cash flow is discounted by 1 year discount factor which is 0.909. But why year 2 still using the 1 year discount factor 0.909. Discount that terminal value to present time shouldn’t it use 0.826?

    Thank you

    December 2, 2015 at 10:43 am #286944
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I will answer this, but in future you must use the Ask the Tutor Forum if you want me to answer – this forum is for students to help each other.

    You are happy (I think) about using the dividend valuation formula in order to get the present value of an inflating perpetuity.
    However that formula gives the present value on the basis that the first flow is in 1 years time. Here, the first flow is in 2 years time (1 year later than time 1) and therefore the formula gives a PV one year later as well (at time 1 instead of at time 0). So we need to discount the answer by 1 year to account for the fact that it is one year later.

    Hope that helps 🙂

    December 2, 2015 at 12:45 pm #286975
    faniacca
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Thank you very much, sir. It’s clear for me now.

    I’m ll post my question as your request in the future.

    December 2, 2015 at 2:50 pm #286999
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Great 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • maryrena77 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in