Forum Replies Created
- Posts
passed 53% and now affiliate …. Its a miracle i was expecting Mid 30s seriously….
@latoyah84 said:
Overall I believe that the exam is all that I thought it would be ( a very hard, time pressured paper, ambiguous requirements that can be interpreted based on the reader).The EVA calculation was a God send as at least i can receive some marks from that.
the rest of question one CSFs and KPIs while it is somewhat expected i believe explaining then apply the three new manufacturing system to all three that’s a bit time consuming. ran out of time for the final requirement
Q2 and 3 where the other two i attempted. while Q3 looked easy enough as Balance score card was tested in F5 and P3 it was a bit difficult to put the points in as the CEO didnt want measurement but how it would improve the performance – it was quite easy to get off track
again the calculation of the overcrowding issue was a saving grace.
unfortunately i ran out of time before being able to do justice to the final requirement.
i hope for a 50, wish the same for all of you
540 overcrowded I am not sure how did I get it . On transfer pricing moving to full cost will result in lost benefit of tax on the loss (sale690-cost 690) results in zero profit or loss hence no tax benefit or expense . Under marginal costing (price 629- COST 690) loss 61 (TAX BENEFIT ON LOSS (18.30) (61*30%)
540 overcrowded I am not sure how did I get it . On transfer pricing moving to full cost will result in lost benefit of tax on the loss (sale690-cost 690) results in zero profit or loss hence no tax benefit or expense . Under marginal costing (price 629- COST 690) loss 61 (TAX BENEFIT ON LOSS (18.30) (61*30%)
Who is managed a 540 overcrowded ??? And please tell me about transfer pricing question .. did any one concluded that changing transfer pricing would have impact a increase in loss in Cleland ?
And in transfer pricing concluded that company would have taken more loss as moving to full cost approach suggested by govt
I am not sure I saw what I have assumed any way I have got Eva more then the calculated by junior .
What about the bsc seat accupancy I have got 540 more passenger in the peak time in region 1
Do not go with practicality in p5 . It was clearly mentioned d/e was 100% . Which means that company was financed by 100% debt
Please don’t confuse me the resultant cost of equity should be zero if the company was100% geared
I did not take the amortisation of marketing expens just added 46.2 two years expense as no time frame was given for marketing to amortize the expense
How did you guys calculated the wacc ?? I assumed the company was 100%. Geared and took 5% as wacc
.16*0/100+ .0476*100/100 =4.76% OR 5% AS round off wacc
The transfer pricing calculation were straight forward for me but I struggled last part of the q2,
6 marks for bsc was also managed quite well as online peak time overcrowded by 540 seats