Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- December 4, 2020 at 7:20 am #597587
Thank you, sir!
November 14, 2020 at 10:52 am #594986Thank you sir!
November 11, 2020 at 1:01 pm #594726Thank you so much, sir
May 18, 2020 at 4:09 pm #571198Thank you sir
May 14, 2020 at 4:10 am #570764Thank you sir, I understand now. Thank you so much!
February 11, 2020 at 1:49 am #561316I got it sir, thank you so much!
February 10, 2020 at 10:24 am #561256I mean I know that it will indeed affect decision making, but is it correct to classify it as ‘relevant cost’? Thank you sir!!
December 5, 2019 at 1:48 pm #555098Ah..got it, thank you sir!!
December 2, 2019 at 1:20 pm #554446Oh I see… Thank u so much sir!!
December 2, 2019 at 1:04 pm #554434Hi sir, I got it, thank you! 🙂
But in task 3 of 19.1, why is SOPL not included in double entry?December 1, 2019 at 3:10 am #554282Okay I will, thank you sir!! 🙂
November 30, 2019 at 12:27 pm #554242Sir, in task 2 of question 19.3, why is the carrying amount of buildings not the revalued amount — $1800,000?
Thank u so much sir!
November 30, 2019 at 10:38 am #554238Hi sir,
Question 19.1
I’m also not sure about the double entry of (b) in task 2. If we make a full double entry and disregard suspense account, is it should be:
Dr. Cash 600,000
Dr. SOPL 100,000
Cr. Disposal 700,000November 28, 2019 at 2:04 am #553961WOW.. I finally understand now
Thank you so much for your time and patience, sir!! 🙂
November 27, 2019 at 4:12 pm #553936Hi sir,
I watched your lecture again regarding this point. However I still need some help to clarify:
Now I totally get your mean by ‘not charging $100 twice’. If we do in the second way, is last year’s SOPL also effected? I mean now we remove the expense and allowance from last year, so actually last year’s expense should be less 🙁
November 27, 2019 at 3:08 pm #553928Hi sir, sorry for my typo. It should be 11.18. Thanks!
November 27, 2019 at 1:54 pm #553915Sir, I’m also confused by answer of question 11.13 in BPP. I’ve read your reply to the same question before, but I still couldn’t understand:
In the previous year, we debit irrecoverable debt expense a/c and credit allowance for receivables a/c, as a result, the expense is included in last year’s SOPL. However, if the answer is (1000-850)+500, it means that we put the $100 in this year’s SOPL again, and it doesn’t make sense. Because we should only debit allowance for receivables a/c and credit receivables a/c this year and there’s nothing to do with irrecoverable debt expense. Could you please kindly explain..:(
Thank you so much!!
November 24, 2019 at 12:47 pm #553605Thank you sir 🙂
November 22, 2019 at 10:06 am #553445Okay sir I got it. Thank you so much 🙂
November 21, 2019 at 4:18 pm #553325Sir, please also help to explain choice B of 32.4 in BPP kit. It says transferring cost of repairs to Purchase and wages account, why isn’t it correct to credit repairs and debit purchase and wages? I thought we should increase cost in purchase and wages and decrease it in repairs. Could you please help. Thank u!! 🙂
November 20, 2019 at 3:05 am #553117Thank you sir!! 🙂
November 19, 2019 at 9:19 am #553055WOW. Thank you for your explanation, sir 🙂
November 17, 2019 at 12:59 pm #552906I got it sir, thank you sooo much!!! 🙂
November 17, 2019 at 10:24 am #552886Hi sir, yes I’ve watched your lecture on this, that’s why I’m confused because in this question, it didn’t show cost and accumulated depreciation separately but only showed a single value. So I don’t know what this value is 🙁
November 16, 2019 at 1:33 pm #552787Thank you sir!
But I’m so confused because I thought in the SOFP, the value of assets is always the original value. And in other questions, it is clearly shown in the SOFP whether the amount is carrying amount or original cost but in this one, it only says ‘non-current assets’. So how could we judge? Thank u so much sir - AuthorPosts