Forum Replies Created
- Posts
studiouscluedious, do not be worry, i know you are not Alex Watt, you cannot be Alex Watt. An examiner of professional exams cannot be so cheap to start a sentence with “ You losers are pathetic.“
You are an imaginative person who cares about poetry and imaginations. You do not have preferences or aims in life. So you do not worry about exams and numbers.HI, studoiucluediou. please do not be a showoff.It is not about the difficulty of the paper. what was difficult, can you tell me. performance prism, benchmarking, six sigma, DMAIC or MBO.?
The problems is that the requirements were not clear. Why would one examiner play around with the question requirements, he could simply mentioned, calculate NPV’ MIRR and EVA, but he mentioned, do what the accountant did. Then in Q3, part(a) and part (b) had the same requirements.I personally did every single part of all 4 questions and i will pass this paper. However, if the requirements were not so confusing, i could had proper and better time management. I could secure 70% or even above. Understanding of the questions requirements took most of the time.
Regarding English, we are not doing masters in english literature. I have problems in this part, but I passed P7 in dec 2011 with 73 marks. I can share my result with you if you want.I agree, work, kids, home, studies and than there is an examiner who plays around the questions. Why did he mention about the quote in Q1 “what gets measure, gets done” he could simply mentioned about MBO. Is he claiming that everyone who studied about MBO, should know about this quote.
I personally knew, but there would be the students who might not read it before.
He wants to prove us stupid and dumb as well as other examiners as we can pass their exams in first sitting. The other examiners should take a training from Alex,watt, the subject should be “how to fail the students even if they had 95% knowledge of the syllabus.
He writes about performance prism , the requirements of stakeholders, does he understand what really this means. Does he know, who are the the primary stakeholders in ACCA?It was a disaster, not a single question was clear there. 14 marks for performance prism as well as measurement indicators, means 12 minutes for all facets of prisms, its application to the question data and the suggestions for improvements. It is not testing of students’ knowledge, it seems as an effort to fail everyone. Lets see how he marks this.
Dont give up. P7 is an easy paper give another try.
I passed f8 in June 2011 and p7 in this term. As there is a link between these two paper, so for better preparation i would suggest a review of f8.I would recommend open-tuition notes for review and bpp revision kit for final preparation. As you already have the theoretical knowledge so revision kit would be more helpful than the study book.I am sure you will secure very good marks.Best of lucki was hoping 70 plus but got 60 anyhow thanks to Allah as it was my first attempt
I wrote CEO level 1 stage 2
Vim = Level 1 stage 1 as reward and punishment. He mentioned about how much benefit vs cost was there in two option. He also mentioned about directors bonus.
Kathy Yao- Level 2 stage 2. as she did not mention anything about principals rather she was concerned about company’s’ image. SO it is the selfish approach, you scratch my back, i will scratch your. Or it is an approach when someone consider society in order to present his own good image.American Accounting Association approach to ethical issues.
FenABCD
F=Fact.
E=Ethic (Independence, Obedience, Confidentiality)
N=Norm (Objectivity,.Governance. Independence, transparency)
A= Alternative Course of action.
B=Best Course of action.
c=Consequences of each action
D=DecisionHi, i want to join the group, however, i do not have Kaplan study materials. will it not be more proper to give topics for the discussion so anyone could use their available study material and share the points.