Forum Replies Created
- Posts
@finale said:
Hopeneverdies,Supermesiah,AngelaMalta,Chullbulla -aka Jibri,Linktheoryadvocate—we all followed this theory closes at different sittings and we also proved its never wrong
Even “Lee” who is here now has been around for a while…she also knows I would imagineI know I never saw affiliate until now and have never seen someone say the link theory didn’t work. I haven’t seen an actual tick box, however, but I’m keeping hope alive.
@rdsn said:
I cannot.can you?I cannot either.
@ajjajj said:
thank you mate …. I hope this time will be proven correct too.Are you seeing an actual tick box on ebusiness page?
@rdsn said:
did you see affiliate before in previous attempts?Nope, never saw affiliate in source code. Unfortunately we couldn’t even test the theory of source code on the Change Password page in e business this time. Moving from S to M might have been the final clue.
@ajjajj said:
Same here in June I was finalist too but could not make it. I did not see an affiliate in the source code nor was able to access the link. now I can so hopefully this theory work.It better work hahahaha as i have accepted the dam thing and i have already celebrated. i hope i have not done that too early.
Well I havent celebrated yet, but I’m remaining positive and trying not to be nervous with seeing the signs. However, I am here thinking of finally being able to put in my membership application. Do excited. The e business signs never worked for me before so fingers crossed!
Let’s hope the link theory works because my signs seem to be consistent re affiliate in line 202 and the grey and white page. I switched my toggle for the appearance in passed finalists to On after I saw the affiliate mentioned in line 202 though as it was off.
Do you want to do a whatsapp or skype group? We’ve got 27 days until the exam.
@Awais1 said:
What was your last exam? Mine was ATX (UK). So hopefully would post in ATX forum and also would like to read your comments in AAA. I hope we all would pass God willing.Amen to this. The good Lord knows that I am tired of writing AFM
I don’t see any of these things as a finalist .I hope I can prove this link theory to be incorrect and pass.
@supermesiah said:
Just check your certificates at myacca.if you are a finalist and you see a new certificate called professional level certificate then you are an affiliate.it use to be a theory in 2015.expeciary when subscriptions are due.Didn’t see this..sigh
Mine is still saying S. I am so depressed. I thought I had it. I keep getting 45 in AFM. I can’t do it anymore.
@adarshjanan said:
What did you guys write for the reasons to change from conglomerate to new portfolio structure?I spoke about the needs of the shareholders and risk diversification. It moved from a small set of shareholders who invested all their wealth in the company to diverse individual and institutional investors who would be well diversified so they don’t need a single company who is into many different businesses. I hope I nailed that sigh
How did you guys get 157m for apv I had single digits sigh… I thought I did well in this paper but now I don’t think so.. I know where I fell down was calculating the growth on the fcf for Tai as a perpetuity. I didn’t remember that foreseeable future was perpetuity.. I was thinking one year growth… I wonder how many marks were at risk for that growth calculation. What did you guys say Tai would prefer as an acquisition offer?