Forum Replies Created
- Posts
@jake360 said:
My result is the same % as my last exam. Coincidence? Has anyone else got a different %?Same here lol And I got this % for my other 2 papers, which means 3 papers with the same score lol. Really confusing
@xstorm said:
Guys, results are published. Look back on the march 2018 results email. click on it. it will show you june 2018 result. Good luckI did click on it and it said ‘June result’ but showed the same mark as my March result so I doubt it’s the real one
Pass 64% 1st attempt. Much higher than expected. It was a tough and confusing exam. Glad I made it
@odean20 said:
The question say for six month sept to February that would be 16 batch.
I can be wrongMaybe we did different questions because it clearly said that they produced 32 batches from Sept to Feb in my exam lol
@odean20 said:
That was a trick question.First you would have to calculate the revised standard using the learning rate of 85%
The question say after three month ( the 2 batch) the the product reach a steady state.My reason was that i should find the nth batch of the remaining 14 batch (16 batch – 2 batch)
Y=400× 2 batch^0.234
Y=340.109 hoursTotal hours for 2 batch (340.109 × 2 batch) = 680. 22 hours
Y= 400 × 1 bacth ^0.234
=400 hoursTotal hours for 1 batch (400 * 1) = 400 hours
Therfore the nth batch is ( 680 – 4000) = 280.22 hours
Batch 3 onward would take 280.22 hours
Month 1-3 would take 680.22 hours
Month 3-6 would take 3923.08 hours ( nth batch 280.22 × the remaining 14 batch)
Total hours work 4603.3 hoursRevise standard is 4603.3 hours × $16 = $73652.80
Original standard is 400 hours × 16 batch × $16 = $102400
Planning variance is $28747.2 FRevise standard is 4603.3 hours × $16 = $73652.80
Actuall hours worked is 5184 hours × 16 =$82944
Operational variance is $9291.20 AYou are making me confused because isn’t the number of batches is 32 and actual hours worked is 10,384? It’s stated in the case