[tizzler]

Would the fire not be a KAM? Since the 7m in damage was material? Although not causing a material uncertainty in relation to going concern, going concern is a KAM in itself and if not materially uncertain then a KAM is sufficient. KAM being those significant matters with the determination of sufficient being if there is a high risk of there being a material misstatement, it causing us to take more time and more procedures etc. I would be of the opinion it meets the KAM paragraph requirements. Here’s hoping…..

[tizzler]

Please send here too keith_oshaughnessy@hotmail.com

[tizzler]

Can anyone tell me what came up in Sep 15 paper in that case? Thanks Matt2803

[tizzler]

Passed with 62% and considering i left Q1 part B (8marks) and C (7marks) along with Q3 part C (8marks) blank my 62 is out of a possible 77. Not sure how but i will take it for sure. Delighted!!

[Author]

Posts