[thomas]

Grade A

Upper second

Wooooooooooooo?

[thomas]

@14munashe

been looking for you everywhere Mukoma.

Doing mine on NSSA, Submitting 1 Nov 2020

Using Zimbabwe CG framework
PECG Act 2017, NSSA Act 1989, CG framework 2010, NCCG 2014 and other internationally recognized codes such as UK CG Code, ICGN & OECD, King Report as examples of best practice.

email me. shockothomas@gmail.com

[thomas]

hie guys
submitting this Nov

I’ve set my layout as follows and Id like to have your opinion
in Part 3, I begin by describing the
current CG structures on my subject org.

The CG framework, the enabling instruments, how board members are selected, board composition and I went on to describe the board committees and their functions.

Next, I Identified the CG issues under a separate heading.
I stated what the CG code prescribes (or other statutory instruments) vand then desceribed what the org did that is contrary to the aforementioned provision of the code or legislation.

then Root causes of each identified issue

then Implications of tge issues. from financial, operations to impact on stakeholders

the management responsibilities

on that, there’s this issue about the composition of the board, its a CG issue which the management may not even be aware of.
I read on an ealier post that this new topic focuses mainly on the management responses.
My mentor has also advised me to allocate 1500 words to a section about the responses.

how do I resolve that when there hasn’t even been a response because I am the one who I dentified the issue?, The management may not even be aware of it.

lastly, theres recommendations and conclusions.
Which comes first between the 2?

[thomas]

hie guys
submitting this Nov

I’ve set my layout as follows and Id like to have your opinion
in Part 3, I begin by describing the current CG structures om my subject org.
The CG framework, the enabling instruments, how board members are selected, board composition and I went on to describe the board committees and their functions.

Next, I Identified the CG issues under a separate heading.
I stated what the CG code prescribes (or other statutory instruments) vand then desceribed what the org did that is contrary to the aforementioned provision of the code or legislation.

on that, there’s this issue about the composition of the board, its a CG issue which the management may not even be aware of.
I read on an ealier post that this new topic focuses mainly on the management responses.
My mentor has also advised me to allocate 1500 words to a section about the responses.

how do I resolve that when there hasn’t even been a response because I am the one who I dentified the issue?, The management may not even be aware of it.

[thomas]

Can you please suggest any Accounting / Business models relevant with topic 17 other than Mendelow matrix

[thomas]

This is an inquiry about acceptable codes of corporate governance for use in RAP topic 17.

I have heard a lot of speculation that markers insist on using the EOCD or the UK Corporate Governance code.

I intend to do my RAP on a Parastatal in Zimbabwe and the Zimbabwean Government has a Bill on corporate governance which is specific to Public entities only.
In my opinion, This document is the most relevant benchmark to use when evaluating the corporate governance practices for a Zimbabwean Public entity.

The document can be found on the websites of the Parliament of Zimbabwe and the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe below

https://www.rbz.co.zw/index.php/about-us/about-us/legislation/acts/42-legislation/acts/523-public-entities-corporate-governance-act
https://www.parlzim.gov.zw/component/k2/public-entities-corporate-governance-bill-h-b-5-2017

My question is whether it is true that markers insist on using UK corporate governance codes for topic 17

[Author]

Posts