Forum Replies Created
- Posts
I pass with 51 percent on my third attempt and now an affiliate by GOD grace :).
After having failed twice I realised that I was using wrong approach even after memorizing whole of bpp text I failed so this tym around I went through kaplan kit and kaplan text and online resources and passed so effectively I went through two texts two kits all the articles past papers etc etc to obtain 51 😀 and by the way I did all this with having a full time job with a very arrogant boss not giving me holiday for exams so I used to take out tym to study during travelling to and froi was baffled during the exam on how i spend 2 hours on Qs 1 the remaining one hour 15 mins i spend on 3 qs altogether :S. I am hoping & praying for just a 50. Qs 5 was very straightforward but i believe in part b the opinion was adverse and not disclaimer i missed that part 🙁
same happened with me i m frustrated with all this whats the point of all the hard work. Most of the material in my project was taken from the internet and really nowadays we dont require any other mean to take the information from its all in the net
i dint receive my result too 🙁 . i received a letter as well saying that its under investigation. why is that so . did this happen to anyone else ??
paper was v time constrained missed few parts ..QS 1 had too much irrelevant info in scenerio
hello guys help me too i need the past papers from 2003 onwards for p5 . my email id is saralways@yahoo.com
thanks in advance GOD bless 🙂ahh p5 🙁 i forgot the mirr calculation i looked at it two days back and in exam i was blank
the examiner should have done little mercy requirements should have been more easy to interpret all time i was thinking if what i am writing is right or not especially qs 1 part a and c and qs 4 part a n qs 5 was out of my reach GOD knows what was it.soo depressed after studying the whole book whole kit in exam its like i m the dumb of all . This paper is not justified complex calculations and theory requires a lot to write n time is too less .
i left easy 10 marks theory parts coz i ran out of time .
can some1 tell what did examiner mean by saying calculate MV of WACC ? got confusd on dis partfirst 2 qs were fair but Ratios i dint comment much plus i think interest cover ratio n debt ratio for 2010 could not b calculated as PBIT was negative loss Right?? n last qs could not complete 🙁 i hope for 50 +
Paper was actually horrible i shud say . All predictions in vain . not even a bit similar to past papers. What do tis examiners want first f6 n now f8 🙁
after total income u deduct Personal allowance.I did blunders wid qs 5 forgot tht extended relief could b claimed for 3 previous years
qs 4 was horrible. Does any1 here remember was car list price above 80000 limit ??n was discussion required in last qs ??mess sooo worried now it was my repeating paper n i just dint do good 🙁
i just dint manage to complete few parts i think i dint answer altogether 10 marks :((