Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- June 9, 2011 at 7:31 am #83738
hope the standard could be set higher, then fail you all…
June 8, 2011 at 2:27 pm #83692compare to Dec’10 sitting, it was damn Easy in this round, but it can be a disaster too. As standard demanding might set higher.
February 21, 2011 at 1:40 pm #77952passed with 59 for 1st attempt. really surprise!
December 15, 2010 at 1:14 pm #73669December 11, 2010 at 11:10 pm #73646i also don’t know what is the Q’s precondition been defined. But i wrote as to “pre-check” before accepting any engagement, eg. any conflict of interest, staff ability, expertise required, experience in client’s industry or gained in the past of similar industry..
December 11, 2010 at 1:10 pm #74120Well, perhaps you misunderstanding the underlying concept of QUALIFIED AUDIT OPINION.
I suggest you read the OT F8 notes, page 21. Once you totally understood and has a CLEAR SHARP picture in your mind, then re-read the technical article. Then you will understand why adverse opinion will NOT apply in the case study of Q5.
December 10, 2010 at 5:49 pm #74118Management unwilling to provide a representation letter, means auditor unable to obtain a sufficient of Audit Evidence. And since it was considered material, so auditor will qualified the audit opinion, “EXCEPT FOR” will included. Well, some said Disclaimer Opinion. But it was wrong due to only ONE item mentioned and NOT many, so it cant be a pervasive.
December 10, 2010 at 11:57 am #73619December 10, 2010 at 10:24 am #73614@digitalgal said:
paper was tirin n totally unexpected..no ethical issues, no going concern, no coorprate governace..lets hope for the best..What i thought was, the ratio part, you should explain the Going concern in the Audit Risk. Yes, AR = IR x CR x DR. Since we do not have much information about the inherent and Control, so we CANNOT bluff and create “ANOTHER” case study for examiner.
Therefore, we need to use the calculated of Ratio to explain MORE on DR. which Going Concern might be included to answer that Question.Thats my 3 cents
December 8, 2010 at 6:12 pm #73520For the question 1, i think there no absolute answers. As long as you can identify the deficiencies in the system, explain and justify it then recommend a mitigation which in reasonable, sounds logic and make-sense in real, then you will be award of marks.
Actually, she is too kind just asked you to list out the 4 of deficiencies.
December 8, 2010 at 6:03 pm #73517it is unlikely for ACCA doing that, refer to F7 Jun’10, only 28% passed.
December 8, 2010 at 6:01 pm #73516i think the english of word that examiner used too bombastic. non-profession word to use. too many hidden meaning need to guess.
December 8, 2010 at 5:54 pm #73513If a lot of ppl failed, then will they pull up a bit of passing rate?
December 8, 2010 at 5:50 pm #73512Eg. Strengths for the buying department, they enforce the purchasing requisite form, and research for the lowest of price = so called of VFM.
To improve it, I mentioned that the lowest price does not always mean a good in quality especially the nature and extent of the biz is running a hospital so the purchases must further detail study and listed out the authorize supplier then only purchase from them.
December 8, 2010 at 4:47 pm #73499Guys how do you tackle the part of Audit risk?
My answer also included a Going Concern issues, compare the debt collection period and re-payable period for the both of receivable and payable, hence the cash is Nil and overdraft facilities granted, implied the cash flow difficulties.December 8, 2010 at 4:29 pm #73497Analysis the PYQ, only principle repeated.
December 8, 2010 at 4:08 pm #73488i answered Internet audit to reduce fraud, error, increase the control effectiveness and operation more and more effective, as a result VFM… hahha…
December 8, 2010 at 3:26 pm #73473yes, it is material but NOT a pervasive. You should read the Opentution notes, page 21
December 8, 2010 at 3:13 pm #73467I think the opinion should go for “Except for” because it is not a pervasive.
November 29, 2010 at 2:52 pm #71358which Q? let me have a look…
November 29, 2010 at 2:46 pm #71904from the engagement til audit report date?
November 24, 2010 at 2:21 pm #71359pass year got, i think june or dec’08
November 24, 2010 at 2:21 pm #71356are you talking end balance at SOFP/SOCI or transaction/system(purchases-system)?
those treatment will be different…November 23, 2010 at 11:04 pm #71288Thanks, finally i understand…
Modified report != modified/qualified opinion, they are different things.
So in short EoM is Modified report but with unqualified opinion.November 23, 2010 at 1:42 pm #70729@gromit
can you help to look this question.. Iam self-studying F8 so encounter the EoM issues…
Emphasis of Matter (EoM) - AuthorPosts