• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Profile picture of
Active 8 years ago
  • Topics: 0
  • Replies: 22
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 10, 2017 at 8:57 pm #392557
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Anyone remember about the lease or borrow to lease decision? Whether the maintenance costs were relevant under both?

    June 10, 2017 at 2:00 pm #392504
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @aboluwarin said:
    Did anyone notice in the wacc question it was cum div and cum interest

    Div and interest had just been paid so ex

    June 10, 2017 at 7:20 am #392429
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @dtngocanh89 said:
    Q22 was about valuation basises:
    Answers was:

    a) Net realisable value- when company has no intention to liquidate

    b)…
    c)…

    d) Replacement value when it is going to liquidate

    I think a 🙂

    A) is when there is intention to liquidate and D) is when estimating the cost of starting up from scratch. So neither answer

    June 10, 2017 at 7:17 am #392428
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @ivalina20 said:
    Can someone remember the Mcq for the dividend growth model. I think it was dividend paid

    1. 2. 3. 4
    0.300 0.314 0.328 0.348

    What was the growth rate that you have

    Think it was 3%

    June 9, 2017 at 7:43 pm #392334
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Pretty sure it was 3.38 rounded to 3.4

    June 9, 2017 at 6:14 pm #392291
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @surajnair said:
    2% discount? Yea option D . Not sure about buffer stock. How about equity beta and fra? I got 1.16 for equity beta and 37500 for fra

    How did you calculate the fra?

    June 9, 2017 at 5:26 pm #392261
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    The question regarding interest derivatives. I chose a which was that swap of fixed and variable rates must be beneficial to both parties but it was a complete guess.

    The one about the international Fisher effect and purchasing power parity. I chose that the Fisher effect statementioned was incorrect but purchasing power parity was right. Again a guess.

    The saving or cost of leading was option a I believe. Around 97k if I remember correctly.

    June 9, 2017 at 5:20 pm #392252
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @adam94 said:
    What was the answer for Payback in NPV mtq? I think it was option A 3.4 years

    Can’t remember if it was a b c or d but I’m sure the answer was 3.4

    June 9, 2017 at 5:17 pm #392248
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Yes with 10 I did liquidity ratios so option c. The others were signs of under capitalisation

    June 9, 2017 at 5:11 pm #392241
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Had A for Q1.

    Yes, wacc was 11.67% in q31 (allowing for some rounding. Q32 was npv of 60 to 61 I think. Think I taxed a year which had a loss but probably only lose a mark at the most.

    March 10, 2017 at 6:32 pm #377643
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @ranapardeep87 said:
    I admit some of the question in MCQ section were time consuming, but some of them were relatively simple and it was just a matter of second to answer those question. Like there was a question where VC was 230, and question was to provide the price at which profit is optimum and the answer is 230 because optimum profit is there where MC = MR, and if anyone has gone through the Breakeven point analysis then he should be answering such questions in very less time. Overall the Exam was OK.

    Can’t remember what the numerical answer was but your method is wrong. MC=MR is right but MC doesn’t equal P. You needed to do MC=a -2bq and solve then insert your figures for a,b,q into the price equat ion P=a – bq

    March 9, 2017 at 8:13 pm #377247
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @petraicon said:
    Q31 for material planning usage variances:
    I did actual production at standard quantity by standard price
    24000*2m(2.2m/110*100) * €3 (2.85/95*100) = 144000
    and
    actual production at new design quantity by standard price
    24000*2.2m*€3 =158400
    144000-158400= €14400 Adverse planning usage
    Is this really wrong?will I get any marks?

    Anyone remember the actual quantity used in production? I think it was 54,000 or close?

    March 9, 2017 at 2:37 pm #377112
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Why would they give 7 or 8 marks for 2 basic variances from f2?

    March 8, 2017 at 7:00 pm #376781
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Shadow price is the amount the business would be willing to pay over and above the normal price of the scarce resource. So not sure about the mcq answer as I interpreted it as saying just the amount the business would be willing to pay

    March 8, 2017 at 6:04 pm #376711
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @micksymooresy16 said:
    Found the MCQs awful, so hard!

    Q 31 – I did materials price var, then did materials usage variance and broke it into planning and operating variances. Same for labour effiecieny, anyone do the same?

    Yes I did the same. What was your materials price variance? Assume you did one variance for price as it was all planning?

    March 8, 2017 at 5:56 pm #376699
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Yes but was unsure of maturity. Thought it could be growth but then surely total cost is lowest when all economies of scale are achieved

    March 8, 2017 at 5:51 pm #376693
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    On the rolling budget the customer support costs were variable to the number of customers. So worked out the vc cost per unit by figuring out the number of customers at budgeted level and then using the new customer growth rate worked out the number of customers in q3. No of customers x vc cost per unit would be customer support costs in q3. Then next part of the question was staff costs which were partly variables so used high low method to separate out fixed costs. Hope this was right!

    Does anyone remember what the answer was for Q1? The line on the graph represented profit, revenue etc..?

    October 17, 2016 at 12:05 am #343581
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Passed with 90%. Over the moon

    September 9, 2016 at 7:11 am #339255
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Anyone remember what the share price was immediately before acquisition for the parent in question 32? As part of the ceo’s observations current price was 2.30

    September 7, 2016 at 6:43 pm #338747
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @rangeuk said:
    Q 31. I split property and plant. Property cost b/f was 75k – 15k accumulated depn (5 years of 25 years). Revaluation took place half way though year to 66.3m (weird number) then depreciated 6/12 at 3k plus 6/12 at 66.3/20 remaining years. Pretty sure this is wrong but gave it a crack. I tried to break the conversion loan into liability and equity so was like 40m so 2.4m * DF ??? for 2 years plus the 42.4 in final year? equity was balancing figure. Again my SOFP didnt balance but think that deferred tax messed me up.
    Multiple choice were fine if you knew your standards.

    Did the same and balanced. Maybe your deferred tax was off

    September 7, 2016 at 8:20 am #338498
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Had the same figure for Sfp-138,600

    September 7, 2016 at 8:19 am #338497
    mysterysunnydeol89
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    MCQ Q3 with the government grant offsetting the non current assets. What adjustment was necessary to repay the grant. Think the question was 90k non current asset with a 6 year life and 30k grant to offset it. Grant returned at the beginning of the 2nd year.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on PM Chapter 12 Questions Quantitative analysis in budgeting
  • Dead0k on PM Chapter 12 Questions Quantitative analysis in budgeting
  • Maede on Professional Ethics – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • John Moffat on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • AdityaSairam on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in