Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- March 10, 2018 at 3:27 pm #442082
Hi for q31, we can go either ways about it right with or without the 20% increase, because that will reflect at the end of next year, if we do the expansion at the beginning, same profits remain for higher capital ratio, they just stated after expansion, so it isn’t clear whether they were referring to immediately or after a 20% hike.
Just my opinion, I had worked it out originally with the 20% hike but then the Market price would be affected, because a year down the lane the whole impact of rights issue is wiped off i.e loss in market value immediately after expansion is lost, which made me rework with existing profits.
Just my thoughts. Hope I get some marks for it.
March 7, 2018 at 9:01 pm #441172I got operational and planning both favorable, I took the original budget worked without any LR involved as the director’s concern with the preparation of the budget by the trainee was that he did not consider the LR effect while preparing the budget.
March 7, 2018 at 8:46 pm #441165Learning rate is 90% for the actual performance, it stops in November i.e last seen effect of learning rate is in November. No effect of LR from December onward.
If it’s with respect to the hospital procedures, then procedure 1 increases and procedure 2 decreases.
March 7, 2018 at 7:06 pm #441142I think the q32 c) minimum transfer price should be $14, because division A has an existing market for it’s adapters i.e. 30,000, but irrespective of that it is being transferred to division B, hence the opportunity cost i.e. the sales lost – any reduction in sales due to it being an internal transfer. Hence, selling price i.e $15 less Variable selling cost to external market $1 equals $14.
And nursing hours per patient per day can be 30 hours, what gives the notion that it’s a single nurse which attends a patient, it could be 3 nurses working 10 hour shifts, taking care of single patient.
Please do correct me if I am wrong. thank you.
- AuthorPosts