[soniasameersohail]

Nope..I did self studies..but I revised the book twice..and mcqs I practiced a lot because they can be very scoring

[soniasameersohail]

Ayesha I didn’t use OT at all..just come here for suggestions and blog to see if I’m missing on some important news…I used Kaplan book and did my past papers from there only..attempted hardly 30 questions but did all the MCQs..

[soniasameersohail]

Passed with 76 percent.first attempt..alhumdulillah..I had left the last part of the last question..just wrotebthe formula cuz there was no Time..I knew I would flunk..but god had been too kind.congratulations to all of those who cleared it and those who didn’t please don’t loose hope..at times god has something better in store for u..keep trying

[soniasameersohail]

I think I’ll go crazy after reading all these replies now..I’ve messed up so bad in the exam..now I’m clueless if I should start preparing for f8 or continue with f7..f8 is all theory and I’m sure I’d flunk in that numerous tines before getting to other exams ??..

[soniasameersohail]

@frenk777 said:
Hi guys, can you please hep me. I was sure until now that in Q3 it was only P&L and Changes in Equity statement had to be prepared as per the question. Was it also necessary to prepare the Balance sheet as well? Thanks a lot

Yes u were supposed to make a balance sheet too..it was of 10 marks..I couldn’t get time to comment on the diluted EPs figures..just wrote the formula ..paper was just OK..I’m just praying that I pass

[soniasameersohail]

Please can anyone reply to.my question

[soniasameersohail]

yes i have the same problem..bpp is soo detailed and it just makes me goo so restless…whereas kaplan is too brief…u cannot expect to study theory from kaplan and get good marks..so ive decided to used kaplan and bpp both for f4..i studied through bpp but few things that loooked too detail to me , i studied using kaplan..but in kaplan u shud memorize everything..u cant just simply skim through

[soniasameersohail]

yes i have the same problem..bpp is soo detailed and it just makes me goo so restless…whereas kaplan is too brief…u cannot expect to study theory from kaplan and get good marks..so ive decided to used kaplan and bpp both for f4..i studied through bpp but few things that loooked too detail to me , i studied using kaplan..but in kaplan u shud memorize everything..u cant just simply skim through

[soniasameersohail]

when can we get the answers from professionals?? and dont u people think that the results wud come out too late..they shudve been announced by mid jan..its soo unfair!!!

[soniasameersohail]

in question 8 i wrote abt intention to create legal relations..in case of ben the idea of other relations would apply and incase of chee i applied the concept of other domestic arrangement cuz i thut that chee was her friend..bth were liable to pay back..i also included the concept of service that they had asked for service and therefore they are liable to pay…its one of the exceptions to past consideration…

in question 9 i came up with the leftover profit of pound 1000..and so the distribution of total pound 4000 wasnt valid as it was a public limited company..in part two of the question i discussed the concepts that net assets should be more than issued capital and undistributed reserves….so lets c how much i score…

in question 10 i distributed the leftover 10000 to the partners..they had to forego the rest of their capital..

in economic financial liability of tort, i wrote abt volenti non fit injuria and contributory negligence..i think this is compeletely wrong..i shud have instead written abt but for test…but as they had asked for the liability, i concluded they meant remedies if losses are incurred….

[soniasameersohail]

@sabrina1942 said:
F6 definitely is a calculation, F5 its a bit of both theoretical and calculative. Check the pass papers on the ACCA website u will get an idea on how the paper is structured. I must say that when i wrote F5 i didn’t do any practice question cus its all about application of what you have learned and by all means learn it by heart and u would be successful. U can also go to both Bpp and kaplan site check the content ensure that all area of the study guide is covered.

I must say ACCA recommend both of these text so u shouldn’t go wrong.
Good Luck

So u wrote F4 how was it and i fig u used kaplan text huh

thanx sabrina..and i used bpp for f4..i hope to expect atleast 60 percent

[soniasameersohail]

but please tell me which one is theoritical and which one is calculative..f5 or f6??

[soniasameersohail]

@soniasameersohail said:
i want to appear for f5 and f6 in the coming june 2011..can anyone please tell me what books to go for..ive heard that kaplan is good for calculative paper and bpp for theory..so please tell me if f5 and f6 are based on theory or calculations?? because then ill purchase the books respectively

help neededdd..so please ppl reply asap

[soniasameersohail]

i want to appear for f5 and f6 in the coming june 2011..can anyone please tell me what books to go for..ive heard that kaplan is good for calculative paper and bpp for theory..so please tell me if f5 and f6 are based on theory or calculations?? because then ill purchase the books respectively

[soniasameersohail]

i didnt write liquidated damages nd penalty clause in breach of a contract..rest i wrote all including damages, common law remedies nd equitable remedies..how many marks will be deducted

[soniasameersohail]

can anyone help in relation to question 10 of the paper..i dunno wat the answer shudve been

[soniasameersohail]

question nine was a complete lame attempt from me..i said that both dee and eff cannot pay dividends as accumulated realised profits are less than accumultaed realised losses..the 5000 of the revaluation is supposed to go to the reserves and cannot be distributedd…

[soniasameersohail]

well kuzma to be very honest..i did the same..i distributed the remaining 10000 as the return of capital with geo being returned the highest..i even made such a mess outta that answerr..im definitely not done with question 10

[soniasameersohail]

i think if neighbour principle is related to damages then it has to have the explanation for duty of care where we need to quote the case of a woman who drank a bottle of gin that contained decomposed snail at the bottom..i dnt exactly remember the name of the case but its probably donoghue vs stevenson

[soniasameersohail]

im soo confused..i cant even tell how the paper was..was it easy or tough,,,they had required simple answers but the way they had presented the questions was difficult to apprehend…i had problems understanding few questions
question 1 —- they first asked to diffrentiate between primary and delegated legislation.besides their definitions, their main differences was in the way court was excercising authority over them..but they made this as a seperate question in part b of the same question

in another question they had asked preemption rights and rights issue..whats the difference anyways??
what about liabilty for economic/financial law related to the tort?

[soniasameersohail]

thankyou starfish 🙂

[Author]

Posts