Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- April 5, 2015 at 5:03 pm #240208
Thank you. I understand better now.
April 5, 2015 at 7:19 am #240159I have another question for this same exam question. In W2, there’s a FV adj of $3000 with regards to the plant. And then in W3, there’s the same adj of $3000 for the plant. My question is, if this adjustment has already been made in pre-acquisition, why is it adjusted again in the post-acquisition part where we arrived at $2200?
April 5, 2015 at 6:39 am #240158Got it! Thanks!
March 8, 2015 at 2:02 pm #231710Lol… no sir. That’s actually my favourite chocolate ice cream on waffles. I just couldn’t rotate the picture so that it ll look like a normal waffle. 😀
March 8, 2015 at 5:25 am #231654Oops.. i m sorry.
February 11, 2015 at 4:42 am #227777Great! Thank you for your time.
February 10, 2015 at 4:25 am #227500Thank you! That’s really a helpful advise. Which means if I am opting to do P6 then I should really consider my F6 variant wisely. What if I skip F6 for now and do F7 and F8 first, will those papers require some knowledge in F6? I m hoping to keep my study time flexible for now by using the tutorials and lectures here to study.
February 9, 2015 at 5:14 pm #227419I am from Singapore. Is it advisable at all if I opt to sit for the UK variant for paper F6? Base on our tax history, I know our tax system was first introduced by the British colonial government. Should that matter?
October 22, 2014 at 6:36 pm #205454Oops. I missed our that important detail. Thats right. It is $2 per kg.
If in the question, fixed cost was also given, would it be right if I had used the profit instead to find shadow pricing? I can understand that we are finding how much more we are willing to pay for an extra kilo of material. But, I dont understand why use the contribution when part of contribution is to cover fixed cost.
- AuthorPosts