Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- August 1, 2016 at 9:06 pm #330746
Hello Sir,
Sorry for the 3 messages. I was confused by the rev kit of BPP. I don’t know why, but this time, differently from before, they do not have exercises ordered by study text chapters.
They start right away with big scenarios. So I couldn’t connect the two things together with OT materials.Thank you for your support.
May 11, 2016 at 10:11 am #314564Hello I double checked with ACCA and they said that nothing changes. The only difference will be that instead of manually writing the exam, we are going to type with PC.
Timing of correction, session per year and the rest are going to be the same.
May 10, 2016 at 5:20 pm #314458Definitely!
Thank you very much indeed
March 19, 2016 at 5:54 pm #307088Why profit on sale is not cash flow?
I own a asset at cost 100, depreciated for 50. I sell it for 70, thus I have a surplus of 20.
Why 20 is not cash flow?
I looked everywhere but I don’t understand the logic behind. I have just learned it by heart.
Thank you very much indeed.
February 4, 2016 at 8:21 am #299209Ahhhhhhh! That’s brilliant, Thank you very much!
January 29, 2016 at 3:53 pm #298475You are all scumbags trying to sell something.
This is an open and free website!
January 29, 2016 at 2:02 pm #298468Dear all!
This post was very helpful, even if it’s old.
How are things now?
At the moment I am studying for ACCA and I am planning to relocate to the UK in one year time. Hopefully, I will have passed exams from F1 to F8.
At the moment I am accounting analyst for IBM Slovakia with 3 years experience in the same company. I will be 30 years old and I would like to work in accounting. Does the age matters?
Would you suggest to start to look for jobs via internet, in order to arrive there with already a position?
Should I introduce myself as part-qualified accounant?
Although I know that London is probably the safest bet, I would be interested in the North-West, (Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds). What do you think about it?December 5, 2015 at 5:24 pm #287940:O
thank you
November 29, 2015 at 3:00 pm #286154I totally get the point now and it makes sense.
Thank you both for your advices!
November 26, 2015 at 9:02 pm #285593Thank you very much for your reply.
I assume from your answer that it doesn’t make sense to consider ACCA as an academic title: once you get it, it’s done and that’s it, you don’t pay more.
“as well as having the paid available” what do you mean by that?
Thanks
November 20, 2015 at 3:50 pm #284194Great, thank you!!
May the force be with you!
November 1, 2015 at 10:53 am #279898Yes, I am watching the lectures while reading your notes. Maybe I missed this bit.
October 25, 2015 at 8:22 pm #278919Ok, now I understand why I got confused.
Because in the notes results it is written
“standard hours for the actual production= 25000 / 20000 × 8000= 10000”
While it should be written 25000/(20000/8000)=10000.
Now I got it.
October 25, 2015 at 7:07 pm #278914Because I don’t understand the logic behind this step
“standard hours for the actual production= 25000 / 20000 × 8000= 10000”
October 25, 2015 at 1:30 pm #278854I see. I am a little confused right now, because in your notes results, p.172, it goes as follows:
actual hours worked = 11000
standard hours for the actual production= 25000 / 20000 × 8000= 10000
Efficiency ratio = 10000 / 11000 = 90.9%What’s the correct one?
Thank you
- AuthorPosts