[samara182]

@ngocphanneu said:
In Q5, i dont understand what 1m of reallocated is? And i read it repeatly about 5 times but still messy

I wrote that it is an irrelevant cost since it is payable regardless if the school closes or not

[samara182]

@gs221108 said:
Q1- market size and market share , did same sort of calculation as planning and operational

Q2- break even chart

Break even was at 500
100- cost 30,000
200 cost 60,000
300 cost 90,000
400 cost 120,000
500 cost 150,000
So for each 100 athletics , cost was going up by 30,000

Fixed cost had semi variable element

Q3- production cost per unit 1W $75 something and $85 something for the other one

Q4- transfer pricing. Messed up completely

Q5- closed school 1 as it had the highest loss among all other and allocated the 80% of students to other two schools and relocation of 50% staff to other schools , messed up in This question too ???

mCQ’s were disaster.

Don’t think I will score more than 30% in the whole paper even though studied day and nights 2 months

Could you please explain why is it 500? I thought I got that right, there goes my pass 🙁

[samara182]

@karanpreetrobin said:
no only two
effectiveness means how successful we are.?

so no of students made it to further education on schedule?
and no of students passed or some sort of success etc?

Yep, I agree

[samara182]

@ritaalbu said:
in q3 that $110 was the selling price or the cost? I think I read selling price hmm can t remember…

I think so too

[samara182]

Hm, for me breakeven point was at 300 athletes – TC equals Revenue in that point?

For learning rate – first 10 is 120 hours, further 30 is 150 hours which means that for first 40 it is 270 hours. Average for first 10 – 12, average for first 40 – 270/40=6.75, 6.75/12=56.25%

EDIT: yeah so it should be 75% although i forgot to continue after calculating r :/

[samara182]

Thank you very much for your answer. I copied it correctly so there must be a mistake.

[Author]

Posts