[rishi121211]

1. I have always had access to the grey and white page on the link with an error message of “WXXXXX”

2. I have always had access to the e-business link, no such tick box exists and if so can someone please confirm where the tick box was located?

Sorry, these theories do not exist. I am an affiliate too and before that a student but still had the same access.

[rishi121211]

Examiners comments are uploaded! Please review, AAA looks better than Dec 2018 sitting!

[rishi121211]

Can someone please explain this link theory? The links above i cannot access at all.

https://www.acca-business.org/accred/
https://www.acca-business.org/pls/ecommerce/elopl001.p

[rishi121211]

I took AAA, failed in december. I left out 17 marks completely due to time constraints. Overall reasonable paper but now need 60% average on all other questions to secure the magic 50

[rishi121211]

@Kylyemada – would you kindly explain what the link theory is?

[rishi121211]

Hi All

I am one paper away from qualifying, what is this link theory and tick box? Can someone please explain succinctly?

Thanks!

[rishi121211]

Thread was deleted.

Now its a waiting game..

[rishi121211]

***Please click on “Exam status and results” in the myacca portal. Who can see the following message:

“Approved content provider” at the bottom, with three bullet points listing kaplan etc?”

[rishi121211]

Passed – 50% First Attempt! A huge thank you to opentuition for the lecture notes and videos!

[rishi121211]

This will be my next paper – any tips?? Congrats to those who have passed 🙂

[rishi121211]

Pass 57 – more than expected!

[rishi121211]

1. Cash kept within a safe
2. Reconciling the cash, credit cards to the sales on tills, as a result identifying discrepancies.
3. Cant remember the third but think there were maybe 2 more which could be used

[rishi121211]

Not sure how tough the marking is for ACCA but there is no way i could have wrote as much as the examiner has answered in the answers to past papers.

[rishi121211]

Surely you would calculate the rates based on normal employees which were 500 . Why overcomplicate?

[rishi121211]

Yes but why calculate on a basis of 450 employees when the QUESTION asked you to exclude this within the calculation

[rishi121211]

I think there is a misunderstanding with the payroll question.

It had specifically said “ignoring redundancy cost”

[Author]

Posts