Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- October 19, 2020 at 5:58 am #590145
48 points first time… I participated on 10 days online course and processed past exam papers. Is it sense to contact ACCA for two points? ? I used LSBF materials on course. Maybe Kaplan would be better? Congrats who passed!
September 3, 2018 at 9:32 pm #471138I had the same questions. MCQ were quite ok (many corporate governance) and the audit risk and answer part was right. I was trouble in CASH/bank control defficiencies (practised during the revision many type but cash not), but wrote some. Substantive testing was for around 15-20 points If I remember well. I am very courious for the results π
January 15, 2018 at 8:57 pm #430285I passed with 57% π
October 16, 2017 at 8:53 pm #41201443 marks ? one month learning beside work. Next time π
I calculated to pass with 56 points but not I corrected the paper.September 9, 2017 at 12:51 pm #406997I did the same.
September 8, 2017 at 11:19 pm #406915Demetrios, your answer was the same as mine relating government π
April 17, 2017 at 7:39 am #381933I passed but needed one month hard learning for that.
March 10, 2017 at 7:31 am #377320Demetrios, there was not any learning curve question.
March 8, 2017 at 7:16 pm #376797Older had higher roi and ri according to my answer π
March 8, 2017 at 6:45 pm #376767Yes. Hopefully well π
Frank, maturityMarch 8, 2017 at 6:41 pm #376760I chose 1 and 2 due to the reason mentioned by Roh ?
March 8, 2017 at 6:36 pm #376756I chose the same as Roh for shadow price
March 8, 2017 at 6:31 pm #376749Gearing ratio I know there is two but which is operational or functional I do not know. Debt/equity and debt/(debt +equity) but I am not sure this is that
March 8, 2017 at 6:21 pm #376736Roh I got 745 If remember well…
March 8, 2017 at 6:12 pm #376724TPAR 1.4 for me as well
March 8, 2017 at 6:08 pm #376714Azaramirov I made exactly the same as you by section A
Gasior the same as you (but did not divide into planning/operational due to lack of time).March 8, 2017 at 5:36 pm #376675Last q32: I mentioned some percentage between target and actual. And went by row wether the actual figures are fit to three main statements of bank or not. Other students?
Jure: e.g. 40%pass rate in dec f5 not so high. This exam was middle/hardMarch 8, 2017 at 5:16 pm #376652I increased VC because that was connected to customer number If I remember well.
I failed MCQ but hopefully other B section Ok.
By TPAR Cost per hour I calculated fixed cost plus all labour cost. Hopefully this was needed.
By section C q31 I just wrote three variances (mainly adverse). Text was challanging there. Q32 marking I am courius how will be markedMarch 8, 2017 at 5:07 pm #376645Was that a good solution by q32 to explain the connection between reported figures and the 3 statement of bank? I write one side but do not know this was the task or not really.
Section A was easy I think but section B hard for me. Good Luck for everybody.March 8, 2017 at 5:01 pm #376642Hi shayan,
I had three hard week learning and went to now in march to f5 (study text read kaplan and revision kit section a and some part from c). We will see in April. Did you go to exam?
The variance part was little difficult and the other C question was interesting. - AuthorPosts