Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- April 15, 2019 at 12:43 am #512507
Wow, well done!! Good mark
April 15, 2019 at 12:41 am #512505Pass 1st Attempt. Thanks Kaplan & Open Tuition SBR UK
March 8, 2019 at 4:43 am #508473i thought under IFRS it could be a subsidiary as there was 50% board representation which could veto everything, furthermore the four were from one shareholder while the 55% was split amongst 5 shareholders. Under FRS 102 it could not be a subsidiary
Under IFRS Crypto could be seen to have controlMarch 2, 2019 at 8:06 am #507096Thanks
February 21, 2019 at 10:26 am #506004Thank you
February 5, 2019 at 6:51 am #504221It is in the latest BPP revision kit and it is a preparation question. Number 2 (leases). the answer show excluding interest amount and no item for interest separately
i use the prep questions for my standards revision
January 14, 2019 at 7:07 am #501577Thank you
January 14, 2019 at 4:15 am #50148651
December 9, 2018 at 11:28 am #488556Thank you…I think this time I may have passed..Changed the way I studied and it helped
December 8, 2018 at 12:06 pm #488451I got 717.25 after deducting 400
December 8, 2018 at 12:06 pm #488450cash offer was best for everyone i thought
December 8, 2018 at 12:04 pm #488449I made a stupid mistake by adding the PV of the unsubsidised loan to the costs and therefore got an answer of (15.8) when it was positive 5. i hope i get marks
December 8, 2018 at 8:55 am #488412I did it differently. The cost of capital was 11% or whatever the figure they gave for Tai. they didn’t give an interest rate, so i did the FCF and used the 11% so did not deduct interest because that is in the cost of capital (not Ke) and then deducted the 400m debt and came to 717.25 as my value of Tai
December 8, 2018 at 4:38 am #488379I made a mistake on my APV final amount but i know i got most calcs rights so i did something like adding up wrong. I hope i get marks
December 8, 2018 at 4:37 am #488378I got 2.72
December 7, 2018 at 5:59 pm #488293Yes, 15.98 negative APV…15.30 negative base NPV
December 6, 2018 at 6:29 am #487822Oh right…they are buying it from someone else?
November 13, 2018 at 8:47 am #484675of course, i took the 29m equity and took 12% of that as debt…it was quite close but not perfect
November 12, 2018 at 10:48 am #484581what they have done it seems is deduct the .16 from the .61 and got .45, whereas if you take .61 x .6 you get .366 and adding .16 gets .526…I don’t understand how that works quite honestly but it does
November 12, 2018 at 10:45 am #484580I did that and it doesn’t match the answer book. that is my calculation. Mine comes to .526 and BPP come to .45
November 9, 2018 at 8:51 am #484268No, but you would make a capital payment upfront which this one is. But rereading the question i see you are right
November 5, 2018 at 4:32 am #483831Right, but if like in q3 Arthuron where they want dividend capacity which is FCF to equity then of course the tax on interest must be taken into account??
November 4, 2018 at 12:52 pm #483771of course, you are right. So when calculating a NPV and they give you a tax figure do not use it???
November 4, 2018 at 12:43 pm #483768Ok, we never bring in tax on the interest…..I thought tax was tax, you pay what the taxman tells you to???? If the P or L says you paid 22.7 tax then that is it????
November 4, 2018 at 12:02 pm #483759Thanks
- AuthorPosts