Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- May 27, 2016 at 5:08 pm #317541
okay. Thank you sir
May 27, 2016 at 2:33 pm #317507They have done it differently so I want to know if it is correct too.As you have said different method provides different answer.
May 26, 2016 at 12:50 pm #317206Thank you sir
May 26, 2016 at 9:38 am #317178Here’s the answer
(b) The planning variances are calculated by comparing the original budget and the revised standards after adjustment for factors
outside the control of the organisation.
On this basis the revised standards would be a price of $4·80 per kg with revised usage at 42g per card.
Planning price variance = ($4·80 – $4)4,200 = $3,360 Adverse
Planning Usage variance = (4,200 – 4,000)$4 = $800 Adverse
The total planning error (variance) is $4,160 Adverse
The operational variances compare the actual spend with the revised budget figures.
Operational price variance = ($5·25 – $4·80)3,500kg = $1,575 Adverse
Operational usage variance = (3,500 – 4,200)$4·80 = $3,360 Favourable
The total operational variance is $1,785 FavourableI didn’t understand about 42g of the revised usage
May 25, 2016 at 5:56 pm #317100please help me calculate planning variance if this question according to your preference.
March 7, 2016 at 1:20 pm #304031Thank you
February 27, 2016 at 10:18 pm #302377Thank you
August 15, 2015 at 9:20 am #267261Okay
Thank youAugust 5, 2015 at 2:31 am #265557Thank you
July 12, 2015 at 11:31 am #260618I feel the same.However,is there any chance of option A?
- AuthorPosts