Forum Replies Created
- Posts
Pass with 63. Now is affiliate 🙂
I would like to say “Thank you very much” for a thousand times to tutor John Moffat and Open Tuition. Without help from John, I don’t know where can I ask for questions by self-study.Without platform of Open Tuition, I don’t know where can I get free study resources that help a lot for the study cost.
Thank you very much!
@aenga said:
I looked through forum topics and in “September results topic” found the statement saying“Last session no one who accessed the link didn’t become an affiliate, but some that couldn’t access become an affiliate!
https://portal.accaglobal.com/portal/page/portal/ACCA_PORTAL_PAGES/ACCA_STUDENTS”is this true????
@aenga Can you access the link?@osamajunaid85 said:
I cant access my-acca since last 2 days, it is saying authentication failedI got the same problem as well. Couldn’t login on 15th Friday. I have never changed passcode at all so didn’t understand why I couldn’t log in. Then asked ACCA and they said need to reset passcode by they cannot do it for me because of uploading result. They asked me to click “forgotten passcode” and I will receive new passcode by email. Since I got new passcode, I still can’t change passcode in my ACCA but only can use the new one.
Thanks John!
When I read BPP Study Text, the formula is g=br where r is the rate of return on new investment. So I always thought using Return on Capital Employed for this formula but now found it’s wrong.
Q1 Dec 2014 used Return on Equity 11% to calculate growth rate of Fugae Company when using Gordon’s formula. Does it mean Return on Equity is same as Ke (Cost of Equity) but in different name?
Many thanks in advance!
Hi John,
It’s the same question.
For (i), the examiner uses Ke when using Gordon’s growth approximation to calculate the growth rate. I thought using Return on Capital Employed. I don’t understand why the examiner use Ke which is required return by shareholder while Gordon’s formula uses Re (g=b x Re) which is return on investment. Did I misunderstand using Return on Capital Employed for Gordon’s formula? Why examiner uses Ke in this question?
Many thanks in advance.
The report says value of the rights allow to delay worth $603592 and add 8.7% to the value of Nente Co share. I would expect the report has assumption of ignoring NPV and only considers value of delay as the value increasing Nente’s value. Did I miss any point from the report or mis-understand about increase of value (I always add NPV and value of real option as total value)?
Many thanks
Hi John,
It’s the same question (Nente Co. June 2012) but I couldn’t search anyone asked this before.
It’s the value of follow-on product. The answer only considers Value of option to delay ($603592) increasing the value of Nente. Why the answer doesn’t consider NPV ($405K) plus Value of option to delay together? The NPV also increases the company’s value but I don’t understand the answer ignores NPV but only use value of option.
Many Thanks
