• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Nischaye

Profile picture of Nischaye
Active 4 years ago
  • Topics: 15
  • Replies: 7
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 4, 2018 at 5:38 am #487102
    12f443e1b4dd87536ad1b453d6a98ebc92a9fc4b2e20e73e905f8d0acba94c0a 80Nischaye
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 7
    • ☆

    Hi,

    Thanks a lot.

    Now i feel a little relieved.

    Continue the great work with the videos, they are very easy to understand and you have a unique way of not making the subject boring.

    Thanks again.

    December 3, 2018 at 3:15 pm #486972
    12f443e1b4dd87536ad1b453d6a98ebc92a9fc4b2e20e73e905f8d0acba94c0a 80Nischaye
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 7
    • ☆

    Hi,

    I think that i understood it.

    The workings that you did is correct.

    In the example of Share exchange, you have calculated the value of P’s shares, which is $6M. The reason why you debited the investment by that amount is because that’s the consideration amount.

    The question did not include the consideration amount, it only specified the type of consideration made, and if that question would have included the consideration amount, it would be something like that, “P acquires 80% of 10M Ord $1 shares at a consideration of $6M where payment is made by offering a share exchange…”

    The question is only mentioning the different types of consideration that P is giving to the Subsidiary. P did acquire 80% of the 10M Ord $1 shares BUT at any moment did they mention the consideration amount. This is the purpose of the question,for us to calculate the consideration.

    I sincerely hope that i got this right. Else i might confuse this during the exams.

    Please confirm my understanding.

    December 3, 2018 at 4:11 am #486867
    12f443e1b4dd87536ad1b453d6a98ebc92a9fc4b2e20e73e905f8d0acba94c0a 80Nischaye
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 7
    • ☆

    Understood.

    Thanks.

    December 3, 2018 at 4:07 am #486866
    12f443e1b4dd87536ad1b453d6a98ebc92a9fc4b2e20e73e905f8d0acba94c0a 80Nischaye
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 7
    • ☆

    Understood.

    Thanks.

    March 6, 2018 at 5:49 pm #440744
    12f443e1b4dd87536ad1b453d6a98ebc92a9fc4b2e20e73e905f8d0acba94c0a 80Nischaye
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 7
    • ☆

    I actually made a mistake while writing the question.

    I meant (1+g)^3. I did understand the concept that at market value in 2 years time will give a numerator of Do (1+g)^3 in the formula. I guess i was in a hurry while writing the question.

    I was too quick to question you. I only had to try the formula to find out that indeed i would get the same answer.

    I feel more at ease while using the formula, i guess i will stick with it.

    Thanks a lot for your time and help 🙂

    Carpe Diem

    December 4, 2017 at 5:25 pm #420303
    12f443e1b4dd87536ad1b453d6a98ebc92a9fc4b2e20e73e905f8d0acba94c0a 80Nischaye
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 7
    • ☆

    When i asked “is it still the case”, i meant, is it still the case that there is little to no chance of getting direct method. I did actually understood the sentence about Sepp Blatter.

    I should have formulated my sentence more properly, my bad XD

    Thanks Mr Mike for your reponse and thanks again for replying to my thread on profit on disposal for cash flow, you made it very clear.

    June 7, 2017 at 9:54 pm #391605
    12f443e1b4dd87536ad1b453d6a98ebc92a9fc4b2e20e73e905f8d0acba94c0a 80Nischaye
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 7
    • ☆

    Thank You for your quick reply 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • kamo7293 on Group SFP – FV adjustments – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • kamo7293 on Group SFP – NCA PUPs – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • fathi on ACCA Flashcards
  • kamo7293 on Group SFP – Example (PUPs) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • kamo7293 on Group SFP – intra group and cash in transit – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in