[natahir1]

sorry I meant to say. p1 & p2 or p1&p3

[natahir1]

I feel its a bit irrelevant to the discussion topic, but I wanted to have a quick answer, if any body could help.
I am thinking to combine p1 with p2…..or should I combine p1 with p3…..what is the better option.

thanks

[natahir1]

I meant f8 is also clear

[natahir1]

Thanks for the update…..still I wonder, if deduction from the current yr’s sales will hurt the matching principle……as the revenue was earned in last year and matched against last year costs. It sounds like current yr’s revenue being reduced without corresponding reduction in costs……? Is it ok if we treat this as debit the profit portion to retained earnings and cost portion as addition to stocks….. please explain……

Thanks

[natahir1]

I am also going to be hit by the same rule, and June 2017 will be the last session for me to sit, and still 7 papers to go….once I asked ACCA this question through email, they did not give me a clear answer…..it was a sort of mix up reply indicating yes….and no….both.
They were not clear themselves…….what I guess they will give more time……on case to case bases……lets say the individuals in the final part may be granted time……..and those lagging far behind…….obviously….no meaning for them…..
After all ACCA has to earn money as well……..so they will give more time…….i hope.

[Author]

Posts