Forum Replies Created
- Posts
Yes, technically, for the ‘weakness’ kind questions, the general method you mentioned is quite useful. But there are some details that confused me a lot, and also this is the reason why I ask you for the content and structure of the client checklist .
For example, the answer says that ‘Overall, the acceptance document appears too brief and there is a lack of information to support the conclusions within the document’ and ‘There is no section evidencing and justifying the type of customer due diligence required’ etc. Most of them are talking about the structure or the content of the checklist. So that really confused me.
And if there are some ways I can send the Qs and As to you, I’d be glad to do so, and we can discuss this question further
Thank you again
I’m really sorry for your confusion about the title. However, thank you for the response.
Emmm.., so, when asked about the quality of…..or the quality control, what I need to do is to find the works they did wrong according to certain ISA standard, right?
emmm
On the BPP workbook, there’s a ‘Activity 3’ the ‘income tax paid’ figure is calculated and added, I just do not understand the difference, why there’s both ‘tax payable’ figure, the question on the BPP workbook adds the figure but the Kit doesn’t.
I am still confused
Well, I think now I have understand the basic logic is that, from the note of FS, I could raise my expectation (whether increase in relevant ratios or decrease in relevant ratios) and compare my expectation to the FS, if there is contradict, there is risk
Is that right?
Thank you, I have already seen that post, but there are two further questions that, why there should be an analytical procedure at the planning stage? what the analytical procedure at the planning stage for?
