Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- June 8, 2015 at 12:30 am #255001
hello mike please help me with the following adjustment (ROBBY)
prior to year end robby sold land to third party for $16m with option to repurchase back on 1st july 2012 for $16m plus 3% premium.. MV on 31st may 2012 is $25m and CV $12m
robby accounted for the sale eliminating bank O/D at 31 may 2012
year end.31 may 2012June 5, 2015 at 8:10 pm #254185Most of the mcqs were from market and treasury function :-/
June 5, 2015 at 8:56 am #253521thank you sir… leaving for the exam now
finger crossed πJune 4, 2015 at 4:47 am #252876well explained!! π
June 4, 2015 at 4:10 am #252874thank you
June 2, 2015 at 8:07 pm #252150sir i also have issue solving the first one mentioned here.. can you please give me your figures (without explaining) so i can just match with mine.. where am i going wrong
thank you so muchMay 28, 2015 at 1:12 pm #249826Thank you very much for your time π
May 28, 2015 at 1:57 am #249723Its quite clear.. One thing, referring to the second point we need to take ex. Div valve of share for calculation so thats why you subtracted $0.60
but if the dividend was not paid till the end of the year we would have to take $5.20 as MV?
Also, assuming you have used growth model why have you not added growth at the end
Req return = [Do(1+g)/Po] +g
Thank you so muchMay 28, 2015 at 12:30 am #249721To serve as hedge or for speculation purpose right?
May 27, 2015 at 1:13 am #249373at the start of the fourth year ie time 3 they need 10% of 5443=544.3 but they have already invested 790.7 in total so they take OUT the extra 246.4 (264) which is a cash inflow and lastly in time 4 they will take all of the 544 invested
hope that helps πMay 25, 2015 at 6:52 pm #248973thank you so much
May 22, 2015 at 11:19 pm #248021you are absolutely great.. π
May 21, 2015 at 11:02 am #247571Yes it was in the dec 14 exam
All the calculations will be the same for the cost? Its just an additional working for that WACC table in the last?May 17, 2015 at 10:12 pm #246706Thanks a lot mike π it’s absolutely clear
May 17, 2015 at 9:15 pm #246697CV $4.2m and FV is $5m
What is the effect if SP is
1. $4.8m?
2. $4m?May 15, 2015 at 9:22 pm #246253Sorry i meant 0.8*2660*9%
May 15, 2015 at 9:18 pm #246252If we do it as 0.8??2660??90%
That would result in a different final result ie net cost
Which is different from the kit answerMay 13, 2015 at 9:10 am #245664Thank you sir i got it π
And what about the working capital in the last year when we are supposed to take it out of the project.. It should be the original one or the inflated one?December 1, 2014 at 5:34 pm #215283Why was tha senior stylist time bottleneck activity?? Anyone?
December 1, 2014 at 5:22 pm #215269How could someone find those mcqs straight forward :-/ not for me
December 1, 2014 at 5:16 pm #215262Any one with key to mcq’s??
- AuthorPosts