[Mohamed]

Overall P3 was fair exam, indeed not easy.

I answer 1,2,4.

For Q1:

A) Contextual features for 20 marks? i believe it was generous grading, yet spent a lot of time.

B) POPIT model – Linking the implication of applying the strategy on People, Organisation, Process and IT – i believe it was straight forward application.

C) barriers to move to E-commerce – Unfortunately I did not read the Question thoroughly as answered from a comprehensive viewpoint not Customers.

Note: Case study was too long – Seriously, I hope the examiners read our comments.

For Q2:

A) Mendelow’s matrix – purpose, Explanation and allocation of stakeholder

i – CEO – High Power/ High Interest
ii – OFCAST (not sure of spelling) – High Power / Low Interest (main interest on fee not relocation)
iii – staff – Low Power/ High interest

B) Roles and Responsibilities of Project sponsor!!! (first glance what is thaaat!!) then i knew its the CEO and the project manager – Again, with well study, not competitive.

Q4: Fairly competitive question – Strategy evaluation

A) 4 strategies to evaluate (overall was tough question given that most of info were available so had to use external thoughts to be critical)

B) Ways of growth – and easiest question of the paper to me (however i raaaan out of time and wrote only 3/4 a page! i chose a strategic alliance due no experience in oversea market and tourist acceptability.

[Mohamed]

@lostinthemist said:

hi can u or anyone tell me if i made a big mistake by using : for example: < 800 > these brackets to show deductions instead of these (800) through out the paper?
am i in trouble?
😛

i believe it is fine.

[Author]

Posts