[maryamwahyd]

Hi,

I’m struggling with word count (doing my RAP on topic 17-Carillion). I decided to skip the recommendation but am now struggling to fit the conclusion within word count.

What would be an ideal word count for the conclusion?

What should I cover in the conclusion? A conclusion of the whole project (starting from part 1) or a conclusion of part 3 only?

[maryamwahyd]

Thanks for your help!

[maryamwahyd]

Thank You so much Gillian!

I have highlighted those points as corporate governance issues. Will try to connect everything together in a paragraph.

Also, I have another question.

I was wondering if it is a must to include the recommendation section in Part 3. Since the company has already gone into liquidation I’m not sure if a recommendation is necessary.

I was thinking of giving a general recommendation on how to avoid another case like Carillion. Will that be alright?

Thank you

[maryamwahyd]

Hi

I’m doing my RAP on topic 17 (Carillion)
I’m confused as to what “including an assessment of the origins of the
corporate governance issue(s)” really means. What does the marker expect to see with regard to this part of the topic?
I have explained the weaknesses of the company and related it to the CG code.
Shall I explain how these weaknesses came into existence in the first place?

Thanks for your help.

[Author]

Posts