Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- December 7, 2021 at 3:06 pm #642912
Oh I finally got it. Thankyou for such a detailed and well written explanation.
I appreciate your help very much.
I will look into your lectures aswell.
Thanks againDecember 5, 2021 at 1:59 pm #642601Thankyou for your reply. I appreciate you explaining it to me but I am still confused because in many questions available in book when interest rate is compounded monthly then the interest rate is divided by 12 , but when compounded every 3 months thes interest rate is not divided by 4. Hence the confusion as to why 2 separate treatment is shown in the book.
For example:
In the book its is given as an illustration that:If the nominal interest rate was 10% per year compounded on a monthly basis then the formula used is
r=(1+i/n)^n -1
r =((1+0.1/12)^12 )-1 =0.1047 ×100= 10.47%As above we are compounding every 12 months so why use a different formula when compounding quarterly?
Again I apologise that i am unable to understand whats the difference.
Thanks in advance.November 29, 2021 at 2:41 pm #642010And below is an answer from the other tutors here on this website for the same question as but giving a different answer to you.
”
Ken Garrett
Keymaster
Topics: 10
Replies: 9641
?????
It’s an error and it should be:(1 + 0.021/4)^4 – 1 = 0.021166 ”
I am so confused. Kindly help
ThankyouNovember 29, 2021 at 2:25 pm #642009Hi
I am struggling with understanding the same question.
Why are different formulas used to calculate effective interest rate in other questions?In some questions treatment is as below:
If the nominal interest rate was 10% per year compounded on a monthly basis then the formula used is
r=(1+i/n)^n -1
r =((1+0.1/12)^12 )-1 =0.1047 ×100= 10.47%So why in above question we are using (1+r)^n -1
I am obviously missing something that sets these 2 examples apart to grant different treatment.
Any help will be much appreciated.
February 22, 2017 at 11:58 am #373653thank you
February 20, 2017 at 3:16 pm #373365thanks very much for your help.
i am still a little bit confused .
because i thought that flexed budget -actual cost= variance due to price/usage or efficiency?
and total material/labour/cost variance = budget-actual
just confused as thats what is mentioned in the book yet some example flex the budget while some do not.January 24, 2017 at 3:08 pm #369336thanks very much
January 24, 2017 at 3:08 pm #369335hi
i have written the question as it is in the book .
how would you solve this question if you ignore what it says as the answer in the book ?May 5, 2016 at 2:02 pm #313823thank you very much for your help
i understand now .
so if total time paid is x= 100%
and time worked is 80% of x= 2400
2400=80% of x
so 2400/80 = 1% of x
30= 1% of x
x= 3000
hours paid is 30000
thanksApril 25, 2016 at 4:38 pm #312639ok . thanks for looking anyway 🙂
January 28, 2016 at 7:17 pm #298379thanks so much for the help 🙂
January 25, 2016 at 10:01 pm #297898it would still be the the same entry in control account or a ledger account,would nt it ?
so confused. - AuthorPosts