Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- May 11, 2017 at 8:43 am #385702
Hi Ken. Yes, from what i’ve learnt (which seems to be in line with the above), it’s easier to visualize when it comes to PPE, agree physical asset to register = completeness, agree sample of register to physical asset = existence. Am i right?
How about payroll, which is the physical asset and which is the register in this case?
Thank you so much.
May 10, 2017 at 2:24 pm #385613I see. So it’s like selecting sample from non current asset register and agree to physical asset to ensure existence, but because wages is transaction balance (p/l a/c), it would be to ensure occurrence. Am i correct to put it this way?
May 10, 2017 at 10:40 am #385587Thank you.
December 5, 2016 at 10:41 am #353986I see. So there is no need to consider any impairment loss but to take $333,600 as the total finance lease. Is it correct to put it like that?
December 5, 2016 at 9:00 am #353954Hi. I got the answer, pls correct if terminology is wrong.
PV of $5m = $3.4m
unwinding interest = $0.272m (8% x $3.4m)Additional cost (PV) = $1.5m
unwinding interest = $0.12mTotal = $5.292m
December 5, 2016 at 7:56 am #353942Answer given was $5,292,000.
December 5, 2016 at 7:54 am #353941The answer given was $97,080.
Could the answer be wrong =/
November 24, 2016 at 5:11 pm #351225Got it. Thank you Mike!
November 24, 2016 at 1:26 pm #351179Hi Mike, back to this Fresco question, can you help me understand again how the rights issue of $13.5m, is split into $9m for share capital and $4.5m for share premium in the SOCE.
Many thanks. - AuthorPosts