[Kingman]

@Hammad Ahmed Qureshi
Sir, can I skip using tables in the doc of Research report and instead plot the table on the excel sheet of Working and Appendices file? ’cause that would save me a lot of words. In commentary of ratios, I will refer to that excel sheet table.

[Kingman]

it’s very specific to you, so you’ll know better

[Kingman]

@ngswr
is that necessary? i mean, words in the graphs, figures.

[Kingman]

14 is superb, don’t even think of going beyond that at the expense of business analysis

[Kingman]

@M.

is it really not necessary to refer the financial analysis?

[Kingman]

@bassaniobroke
same here with me. I come from one of the least developed. i use ‘low purchasing power of people’ to reflect low per-capita GDP/GNI/GNP.
it’s very extensive & strenuous to explain these economic indicators but, in the simplest terms, they all mean a common thing: how poor/wealthy your country is….and that basically leads to larger implications/factors like FDI, infrastructure, gov spending, consumption, labour development, technological advancement, exports vs imports etc……
remember, while you mention GDP in you analysis, don’t forget explain its IMPACT – in the past, now or in the future- on the target co’s business.
seemingly, you’re coming up with a very ‘high-value’ RAP. keep it up & Good luck!

[Kingman]

My dear brother, aisa bhi hota hai kya? A doc file in MB can only be found in Nasa, Area 51 and Pentagon (CIA, 2013)!!!

[Kingman]

@nengibob
yes you’re right. labelling needed for appendices. thanks for reminding bro

[Kingman]

@nengibob

care to share what the issue was so we can learn! please!

[Kingman]

no steadfast rule. anything that SHOULD be referenced MUST be referenced. so what things should be referenced?……
Anything you borrowed from a source and that source can be anything ranging from TV show to a book, a podcast to a magazine…anything.

[Kingman]

@Hammad Ahmed Qureshi

Sir, thanks a lot. Big relief

[Kingman]

@Hammad Ahmed Qureshi
thanks a lot sir

[Kingman]

@Hammad Ahmed Qureshi

Sir should give in-text citation to the things you just mentioned above. as in, whatever we are saying in the ppt presentation are derived from the RR. say, smt we wrote in RR with an in-text/citation….if we write that thing again in the ppt slide of the presentation, do we have to reference it once again?

[Kingman]

@bassaniobroke
haahahhaha bhai. same thing here. i thought i was the only one suffering from citation phobia turned mania

[Kingman]

no you don’t.

[Kingman]

why would you risk that?? or you are up to something to mislead the marker? that’ll be suicidal brother..

[Kingman]

Thanks a lot everyone for generous responses. Special thanks to @Hammad Ahmed Qureshi Sir for carefully explaining it so well. You are a good soul indeed.

[Kingman]

Yes, of course…if you mention smt specific.

[Kingman]

try Google or better scan thru’ the Annual Report. almost all companies present their y/e share prices with comparatives.

[Kingman]

Thanks

[Kingman]

@Hammad

I am a little confused on how to take account of in-text citations in word count. Say, …..(Smith, 2011) is my in-text citation.
Does this lead to a word count of 2 or 1?
The reason I’m asking is, somewhere in the BPP Project guide or so, I had found that each individual in-text citation counts for 1 word only.

[Kingman]

@Hammad Ahmed Qureshi
what if I use 3 models: ratio analysis, SWOT and PESTEL? what could be the word distribution in that case?

can you also comment if the word distribution in my own report ok? my word distribution is as follows:
Ratio analysis = 2200
SWOT = 1300
PESTEL = 700

[Author]

Posts