• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

kcp123

Profile picture of kcp123
Active 8 years ago
  • Topics: 3
  • Replies: 9
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 20, 2012 at 5:54 am #107147
    mysterykcp123
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    HI Good question

    Answer:

    Fundamental breach – dead! Facts arose before 1977 & UCTA didn’t apply to these facts.

    Securicor was engaged by Photo Productions to guard their factories overnight. One of Securicor’s employees lit a fire to keep his hands warm, and negligently managed to burn the factory down – vicarious liability. Plaintiff claimed, but the defendants said that there was an exclusion clause – under no circumstances was Securicor liable for anything. House of Lords couldn’t apply the Act to the facts (facts arose before 1977), but applied the “spirit” of the act. The said that the clause was a perfectly reasonable clause to have in the contract.

    Why?
    1) It was a commercial contract and the firms were on a level playing field
    2) Lord Wilberforce – risks borne by insurance, non-interventionist approach, efficiency of insurance cover ® reasonableness
    3) If Securicor offered a service for a particular price, then the additional cost (of insurance?) for Securicor would push their price up

    Best Wishes
    KCP

    November 20, 2012 at 5:43 am #107423
    mysterykcp123
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    What you did is just fine?

    Dont worry about the exam kit?
    Download past papers and focus on those questions (you need nothing more)

    Best wishes
    KCP

    November 10, 2012 at 5:21 am #106769
    mysterykcp123
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    question regarding the reliability of notes: This site is pretty much ideal for learning

    well if you think the content is too much (notes), acca is not ideal for you.
    if you looking for just certification with no really knowledge, it does not really help you in the long run.

    rest is up to you.

    November 10, 2012 at 5:14 am #106797
    mysterykcp123
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Hope it can help you in your f4 exam!!

    November 4, 2012 at 7:51 am #106097
    mysterykcp123
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Hi,

    Sorry the above answer is quite good to compare CIVIL law vs Criminal Law .

    For your question Common Law and Civil law

    Common Law
    Emerged in England during the Middle ages
    Common Law is UN-codified ( no comprehensive compilation of legal rules and statutes )
    Relies on some scattered statutues(legislative decisions) , based on precedents set by judges
    Judges have enormous role in shaping law.
    It is an adversarial system ( context between two opposing parties and a judge as a moderator )
    A jury of ordinary people may decide the facts of the case

    Civil Law
    developed in continental Europe in Middle ages
    It is codified ( comprehensive legal codes which are continuously updated)
    The role of judge is to establish facts and apply the code as applicable ( work within the framework)
    Judges decision is less important in shaping civil law

    November 4, 2012 at 7:17 am #72373
    mysterykcp123
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    HI anny,

    its not about books. In my opinion all books are alike ( slight cosmetic differences )
    The best way to prepare if time is limited or if you dont have time to spend reading loads of information is.

    1) Use the Past question paper analysis ( in this site)
    2) pick up all the question for the chapter concerned
    3) Light ! Light !! You notice one thing, many questions are repeating ( !!)
    4) After you sort the above questions , using the past question papers and answers make you own notes of key points

    5) My million dollar advice: Its not about the length of the answer thats important
    a) the principles are important ( to get 10 marks make sure you have atleast 10 good legal points)
    b) write in a simple way ( but dont forget to use legal terms)
    c) Complement your answers with examples and case names if you can remember

    Prepare your notes like this and remember if you share it with others like you, it would help you a lot

    mark my word, getting 80 is not difficult

    By the way, i am not an agent of any company, hence dont endorse any particular company, you pickup any book its always the same !! Most important never buy exam kits they are just rips of past exam question papers ( with less tangible benefits )

    Best Wishes

    November 4, 2012 at 7:09 am #105826
    mysterykcp123
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Limited Liability Partnership:
    Brings in the best of both worlds.
    From Partnership it derives : Simplified legal procedures, tax payable as personal Income tax
    From Company it derives : The limited liability status

    to sum up, LLP is created to allow people to create an entity quickly with relatively less legal procedures unlike the company and at the same time having the limited liability for the members ( please do remember in LLP we have to use the term members not partners).
    Mostly used by service oriented businesses having more risk ( accounting firms)

    LTD : Private limited company
    Firstly its a company, hence need to follow the requirements of CA 2006 in setting up, thus making is more complicated in setting it up. It has limited liability but it has to pay corporate income tax ( as a company is a separate legal entity )

    Hope that helps?

    November 13, 2011 at 2:56 am #89503
    mysterykcp123
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Articles commonly stipulate that a third of the directors should retire and stand for re-election each year.

    June 5, 2011 at 12:48 am #71079
    mysterykcp123
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    please can you mail it to kcp.personal@gmail.com

    Thanks a lot

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Nashra30 on CIMA E1 Chapter 3 Test
  • azubair on Financial Performance Measurement – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • j.akshaya on Group SFP – Example (Basic consolidation) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • rishitxx on ACCA BT Chapter 1 – The nature and structure of organisations – Questions
  • singhjyoti on Basic group structures – SPLOCI introduction and example – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in