[justcasj]

Ahh yeee makes sense thanks very much

[justcasj]

So there are two first Batches?. Thats how i saw it and assumed it was an increment. Remember in incremental tables the second batch is always represented as 1 unit. But I see your point

[justcasj]

Hi Oden, I see where your coming from.
The way i saw it, there was an incrememtal increase between the first and second batch. I know in the table the second batch there was a 1 in the number of units produced. As it is an incremental increase, this represents the second batch!. from that point it accumilates. Hence the workings:

10368/32=324
324=400r3
0.81=r3
r=93.21%

[Author]

Posts