• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Profile picture of
Active 8 years ago
  • Topics: 0
  • Replies: 11
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 22, 2017 at 12:49 am #378879
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Much luv @trephena passed with a C. Thanks for your guidance and patience. May God bless and keep you.

    May 16, 2016 at 11:03 pm #315386
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Thanks @Trephena I have used the mendelow matrix placed stakeholders in different quadrants then gone ahead to explain the effect of VW CG on them is that ok? Do I also need to explain why I have placed the stakeholders in a particular quadrant eg explain why I think employees are key.

    Also in I have copied sections of code, presented them in italics and referenced them however, my supervisor is of the view that I should put them in my own words rather than direct quotes. what do you think?

    Thanx for your patience.

    May 16, 2016 at 10:45 am #315309
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    hello @Trephena I’m doing my final walk through I have a quick one; Is it ok to just fit in the key stakeholders in the mendelow matrix or do I also have to give an explanation why they are in a particular quadrant?
    thanks

    May 9, 2016 at 11:42 am #314250
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Thanks

    May 9, 2016 at 9:29 am #314240
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    greetings @Trephena, the German CG Code principles isn’t well articulated as the Uk’s so I have used principles of The UK code as headings and gotten corresponding sections and subsections from the German CG Code for instance ACCOUNTABILITY as a heading then I use subsections from German Code. Is that ok?

    April 28, 2016 at 5:30 pm #312970
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    @Trephena thanks again……

    April 26, 2016 at 1:16 pm #312735
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Congrats Eena

    April 26, 2016 at 1:11 pm #312731
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    @Trephena thanks for your help I’m making progress (I think ) in Part III, have studied the German CG Kodex, the different board types, chose BMW and Range Rover as comparator companies pls could you PM me the article on writing a good T17 Rap so I can check if I’m on the right track. Thank

    March 17, 2016 at 3:16 pm #306811
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Thanks @Trephena I have just downloaded the German CG Kodex, will also research on the German board model. Thanks again.

    March 17, 2016 at 10:33 am #306773
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Hello Trephena,
    thanks for your help with T17 I have followed all the threads . I have also read a lot on CG . I’m thinking of choosing volkswagen as my organisation considering the emission scandal that has just rocked the organisation. I like to know what is your take on this choice ? thank you so much .

    August 13, 2015 at 2:05 am #267004
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    @trephena the main company has a Dec y/e while the comparator has a June y/e should I prorate the comparator’s fs to correspond to that of the main. Considering that the comparator is 6 months ahead.
    Thanx

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • thienan0110 on Interest rate risk management (1) Part 5 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • Venoth on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • kemo1000 on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in