• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Profile picture of
Active 8 years ago
  • Topics: 0
  • Replies: 11
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 22, 2017 at 12:49 am #378879
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Much luv @trephena passed with a C. Thanks for your guidance and patience. May God bless and keep you.

    May 16, 2016 at 11:03 pm #315386
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Thanks @Trephena I have used the mendelow matrix placed stakeholders in different quadrants then gone ahead to explain the effect of VW CG on them is that ok? Do I also need to explain why I have placed the stakeholders in a particular quadrant eg explain why I think employees are key.

    Also in I have copied sections of code, presented them in italics and referenced them however, my supervisor is of the view that I should put them in my own words rather than direct quotes. what do you think?

    Thanx for your patience.

    May 16, 2016 at 10:45 am #315309
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    hello @Trephena I’m doing my final walk through I have a quick one; Is it ok to just fit in the key stakeholders in the mendelow matrix or do I also have to give an explanation why they are in a particular quadrant?
    thanks

    May 9, 2016 at 11:42 am #314250
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Thanks

    May 9, 2016 at 9:29 am #314240
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    greetings @Trephena, the German CG Code principles isn’t well articulated as the Uk’s so I have used principles of The UK code as headings and gotten corresponding sections and subsections from the German CG Code for instance ACCOUNTABILITY as a heading then I use subsections from German Code. Is that ok?

    April 28, 2016 at 5:30 pm #312970
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    @Trephena thanks again……

    April 26, 2016 at 1:16 pm #312735
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Congrats Eena

    April 26, 2016 at 1:11 pm #312731
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    @Trephena thanks for your help I’m making progress (I think ) in Part III, have studied the German CG Kodex, the different board types, chose BMW and Range Rover as comparator companies pls could you PM me the article on writing a good T17 Rap so I can check if I’m on the right track. Thank

    March 17, 2016 at 3:16 pm #306811
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Thanks @Trephena I have just downloaded the German CG Kodex, will also research on the German board model. Thanks again.

    March 17, 2016 at 10:33 am #306773
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Hello Trephena,
    thanks for your help with T17 I have followed all the threads . I have also read a lot on CG . I’m thinking of choosing volkswagen as my organisation considering the emission scandal that has just rocked the organisation. I like to know what is your take on this choice ? thank you so much .

    August 13, 2015 at 2:05 am #267004
    mysteryjpco
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    @trephena the main company has a Dec y/e while the comparator has a June y/e should I prorate the comparator’s fs to correspond to that of the main. Considering that the comparator is 6 months ahead.
    Thanx

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • Ana1674 on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • tehreem21 on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in