Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- September 11, 2020 at 7:10 pm #585170
Got – 3.3 so at least very close lol
September 11, 2020 at 7:09 pm #585169You are selling contract currency, contract currency is R, therefore put option
September 11, 2020 at 4:17 pm #585089Definately a receipt
September 11, 2020 at 2:40 pm #585036Well that was exactly what I thought so I scratched that and went straight to multipliying. As they later say they will invest 60mln in NCA, so those new bonds would not have been sufficient otherwise
September 11, 2020 at 1:28 pm #585020Yeah that’s what I did, but it was total market value of bonds for wacc calculations I’m worried about.
September 11, 2020 at 1:08 pm #585007How did everyone treated the bonds? Did you divide the number given by 100 and then multiplied by market price. I did not divide amount of bonds given by 100 as thought it seemed like very little debt that way, so just multiplied straight away by 104 or 108. Anyone?
September 8, 2016 at 10:46 am #338983That is what I did as well, but most people seem not to have bothered with splitting…ahh relief
September 8, 2016 at 9:03 am #338959I thought convertible loan notes have to be split between equity and liability. Has anyone done that?
March 12, 2016 at 2:43 am #305917Hi I did F4 and F5 this quarter.. Even considering the fact that F4 was CBE, I was really struggling to find time to prepare for F5 properly.. I passed F4, but I am really unsure about F5.. I do not think that doing two exams per quarter is a good idea, especially if you work full time. Have you seen the size of F6 book?
Unless you can do it full time I would not risk it…
March 11, 2016 at 10:49 pm #305856I dont think though that overtime rate was supposed to affect calculations in any way, I believe it was just something to mention when evaluating mangers performance..especially since the total cost for actual labor hours used was already given..
March 11, 2016 at 10:41 pm #305853I think I had adverse rate and favourable efficiency.. but then broken down into planning and operational, both for the labour rate were adverse think about 13k in total or smth and adverse planning and favourable operational for efficiency.. the latter ones were quite a big amounts as well..
March 11, 2016 at 10:22 pm #305849I thought overtime was mentioned just to justify why we had an adverse labor rate variance..
- AuthorPosts