Forum Replies Created
- Posts
John, thanks so much!
It´s difficult paper – the only one I was struggling with.
Thanks to this forum and your comments to all the questions I finally managed to pass and with a save mark! (not close at all to failing).
Thank you especially for your words on European debt crisis and IMF (it helped a lot to know more on this subject) although at the end I decided not to attempt this question on the exam.Wishing you all the best!
61% finally!!! So happy! Now finally can apply for membership!!!! Thanks so much to Open tuition page and open tuition tutor and his lectures !!!!
@dpavlova, i had the same issue. When I heard about the leak on Monday I tried to log in to my page with my usual password and it did not work! So I asked for new password and have received an email back from members@accaglobal.com.
Still 2 days to wait.. this is terrible 🙁@dpavlova i had the same issue. when I heard about the leak on Monday I tried to log in to my page with my usual password and it did not let me. I asked for new password and got email from members@accaglobal.com.
I see my screen white and have there also the graduation date 1st February 2012.
Still almost 2 days to wait. This is terrible 🙁@dpavlova i had the same issue. when I heard about the leak on Monday I tried to log in to my page with my usual password and it did not let me. I asked for new password and got email from members@accaglobal.com.
I see my screen white and have there also the graduation date 1st February 2012.
Still almost 2 days to wait. This is terrible 🙁@dpavlova i had the same issue. when I heard about the leak on Monday I tried to log in to my page with my usual password and it did not let me. I asked for new password and got email from members@accaglobal.com.
I see my screen white and have there also the graduation date 1st February 2012.
Still almost 2 days to wait. This is terrible 🙁@queenie , i have exactly the same data on my page!
Ufff, ACCA made us so nervous now!!!Thank you John. I´m really struggling with time as well – this exam in my opinion is much more time pressuring than others… 🙁
Ohh, sorry…. i guess i’m thinking too much about the exam day :))))
I wanted to write 2009 🙂
Thank you John.John, thank you very much.
My doubt was because in the question it says that synergies are expected to yield 2MM EUR per annum from 20X4 onwards, so I assumed that after 20X6 it also would be 2MM and not increasing. In the answer given I can see that this 2MM is not increased in 20X5 and 20X6, but since the synergy is incorporated into the free cash flow of target, and it says that after 20X6 the whole cash flow would grow 2%, we increase this element as well.
So I guess all is a matter of stating clearly the assumption.Dazhong,
I´m not asking anything to you, so don´t understand your reaction. I´m asking the tutor. It´s “Ask the tutor” forum.
Besides, my question was not about APV method and publicity discount rate.To dazhong0703 – publicity savings is also due to aquisition of Oberberg.
In other questions synergies are not discounted by the discount rate of the target.
44… it was my third attempt…. really don´t know what is happening. I´m done with this exam! changing to taxation!
I regret now that i started from Q1, which was ok, but impossible to do in the time given and becasue of that I didn´t have time anymore to attempt Q5 :(((
It was really tough paper, how can they really check our knowledge giving us so little time????
I´m also tired of ACCA….. what a waste of time it was the whole preparation for this exam…The figure of equity in Effix should be then 0.9784 * 8% = 7.8272 % , right?
So, BPP´s 8.272% is an error?Thanks John, I ´m aware that we are talking here about tax allowable depreciation, but it all depends on the country in question. I assume you´re talking about UK tax rules, in other countries obviously other tax rules would apply, so important to read well the question and as you mentioned, if not clear from question better to make assumption.
thanks a lot skybei1987.
regading your question: maybe it´s BPP error. The “should be” answer i take it as beta * market risk.I figured out the ?S=?m*?, there was 8% market risk in the question, i didn´t notice it before.
I have however other question: when we calculate the geared value of Elfix company, why do we only add the interest part of debt market value (139.643m) to the DT part of the equation V = U+ DT ? why we don´t use the total market value of debt of 218.603 – to have V = 514.972 + 218.603 * 0.3 ?
Many thanks!