• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

ifeoma

Profile picture of ifeoma
Active 9 years ago
  • Topics: 5
  • Replies: 14
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 12, 2015 at 5:25 am #291265
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    Reading all these feed backs, I am scared stiff. Fingers crossed and trusting in God to see me through.

    October 19, 2015 at 2:51 am #277228
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    Passed with 60, on first attempt despite all the errors I made. Thank God for answered prayers.

    September 2, 2015 at 8:19 am #269538
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    Thank you sir. I get it now. If it the question had been adjustment in subsidiary books, then it would have been:

    URP of 70,000 – 14,000(excess depreciation) = 56,000.

    Thank you.

    August 21, 2015 at 2:23 am #267915
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    Sir, pls also assist with the MCQ below. I got $1,437,600 but the answer says is wrong and I don’t get why. Below is the question:

    On 30 April 2014, Algis’s closing inventory was counted and valued at cost of $1.46m. Some items of inventory that had cost $140,000 had been damaged in a fire during March and are not expected to achieve their normal selling price which is calculated by adding a standard mark up of 40%. The sale of these goods will be handled by an agent specializing in fire-damaged goods who is expecting to sell them for 75% of the normal selling price and will charge Algis’s a sales commission of 20%.
    At what value will the closing inventory of Algis’s be reported in its statement of financial position as at 30 April, 2014.

    August 19, 2015 at 7:02 pm #267798
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    Thank you.

    August 18, 2015 at 9:28 pm #267681
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    Yes sir. The question now is how did you arrive at it?

    August 1, 2015 at 6:43 am #263986
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    Passed with 60%. Grateful to God.

    August 1, 2015 at 6:37 am #263979
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    68% on first attempt. So very happy!!!.

    So grateful to open tuition.

    May 22, 2015 at 2:46 am #247812
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    This one is difficult. I thought linear programming was for situations where we have more than one resource constraints and there are 2 assignments or products. In this case there are 3 products. How can we then plot this on the graph. Really interesting!!!!

    Waiting for the solution too

    May 21, 2015 at 9:10 am #247548
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    Yes. The cost of the old factory but I hope the professor will still reply so that we will be double sure the solution I have given is right.

    May 20, 2015 at 1:55 pm #247398
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    You wrote Jake bought factory on May 1999 for £540,000. That’s in the scenario as the initial cot of old factory.

    May 20, 2015 at 12:21 pm #247383
    mysteryifeoma
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    Following the scenario David has painted of Jake reinvesting only £550,000. What I think will apply is this:

    Sales Proceeds £600,000
    Less Cost. (£540,000)
    Gain. £60,000
    Rollover relief £10,000 restricted to 85% (£8,500)
    Chargeable gain. £50,000 plus 15% non biz (£1,500) = £51,500

    Since the entire sales proceeds was not reinvested hence partial rollover relief applies. £50,000 (£600,000 – £550,000) will become immediately chargeable for CGT.
    The rollover relief relief should have been £10,000 the balancing figure. However because the asset has only 85% business use, only £8,500 will be available for relief. The balance non business portion of £1,500 will also be immediately chargeable bringing the total chargeable gain to £51,500.

    Sir, please is my answer correct. Please let us know.

    Thanks

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Starmoon123 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Revenue – Example 5 (profitable contracts) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • amaanalli on Fraud, bribery, whistle-blowing and company ethics – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • verweijlisa on Group SPL – Group profit on disposal – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • verweijlisa on Group SPL – Group profit on disposal – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in