Forum Replies Created
- Posts
@avbosip said:
Hello. I have got approximately about the same around 11%
Hope that’s correct.I hope so too. Did you get Paris Co ? How did you tackle the NPV question ? It consumed too much of my time and I still couldn’t figure out what to do with the little information that was provided.
@ryanwilkes1985 said:
Mate the Paris co was wrong – it had a mistakeYou need to put in an extenuating circumstances report to acca
Really ? :O Do you know what the mistake was? Was it incomplete ?
The other question Mean Co asked for wacc calculation. I think my wacc was 11% but I dont remember exactly. But the theoretical part of this ques where we had to critically discuss regarding capital structure and wacc relationship or something like that, it went bad for me as I didn’t write much. It was worth 10 marks 🙁
I got very confused with Paris Co question. The details were something like, project Z will cause a 27% reduction in energy consumption. And then the annual cost of electricity was given which was 30m and 2% increase in it each year. Tax rate was given and it was mentioned that TAD wasn’t allowed. Also the cost of project was given which was 20m or 25m maybe.
We had to calculate NPV and at first I thought 27% should be taken out of 30m as cash inflow but then I realised I was doing something wrong and then after that I couldn’t figure out what to do and I messed it up badly.
Does anyone know how this question was to be tackled ?For the impact on audit report I wrote qualified opinion because I think misstatement was was not pervasive.
The exam felt a bit unusual. The scenario for deficiency and recommendation was confusing I couldn’t pick out all the deficiencies. Did anyone else feel the same ?
This articles has an example which is so similar to ques31 on learning rate part a.
